Laserfiche WebLink
056*0 <br />amount or sedimenz available for delivery to irricazior_ cinches and <br />drains and the Arkansas River. The sediment associated heavy metals, <br />salts and nutrients reaching the river will also he reduced. These <br />practices will also help preserve the remaining river c=annel capacity. <br />The downstream water users will benefit by receiving himer quality <br />water and reduce: maintenance. r <br />a The fish and wildlife habitat of some species within the watershed will <br />be enhanced through the implementation of this alternative. The <br />overall value of the wildlife habitat in the area will not be changed <br />significantly. Recreation opportunities related to the fisheries and <br />wildlife should see some improvement. Acres affeczed by the project <br />area estimated at less than 50% of the Type I wetlands (45 acres) and <br />less than 1k of the Type VI wetlands (2 acres). NRCS arrived at the <br />acres of Type I wetlands by estimating 60% participation in the <br />project, and 800 of the wetlands on participating farm will be <br />affected. The majority of the Type VI wetlands are along the Arkansas <br />River and the major ditches and drains. It is expected to have no <br />adverse effects on these Type VI wetlands, however, a very small number <br />of on farm drains or ditches could have woody vegetation and associated <br />wetlands. The 1k figure was used to cover these cases. The Types III <br />and V wetlands represent lakes, ponds, and areas with s=allow water <br />most of the growing season. The project is not expected to have any <br />effect on these wetlands. However, if a negative effect occurs due to <br />project = .ion, a mitigation strategy has been developed. <br />The cu- - - ..• al resources located within the project area are close to the <br />Arkansas River and are not effected by the irrigated cropland <br />activities. <br />E The greatest social and economic benefits would be realized with this <br />alternative. These benefits will be achieved as improved water <br />management allows the agricultural producers to better meet crop needs <br />and contribute to the goal of improved water quality. This alternative <br />will provide the greatest protection of the soil resource base from <br />irrigation induced erosion which will also have a positive effect on <br />the local economy. The environmental conditions related to fish and <br />wildlife will see significant improvement thus providing a similar <br />impact on the social and economic conditions of the area. <br />Alternative 3 (Recommended Plan) Monitoring Plan <br />The National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA) is anticipated to <br />begin in 1996 by the USDI Geological Survey in the Arkansas River <br />Basin. NRCS will utilize data to evaluate project effectiveness in <br />regards to selenium. <br />I The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmenz is beginning <br />an intensive alluvial ground water quality monitoring program for the <br />Arkansas River in Colorado. Part of this study will be in the project <br />area and the data will be utilized by NRCS to help measure project <br />effectiveness in regards to selenium and nitrate reduction in <br />groundwater. <br />1 31 <br />