My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 1:36:13 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 3:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/1/1996
Author
Bent Soil Conservation District, Prowers Soil Conservation District, Colorado State Soil Conservation Board, Fort Lyon Canal Company
Title
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0560 <br />also contributes to the local economy. Waterfowl populations may begin , <br />to be impacted by the accumulation of selenium in the ecological <br />system. The Arkansas River fisheries will also be impacted by selenium ' <br />concentrations. These facets of the local economy will be negatively <br />effected by the existing water quality problems. The social <br />implications are that some people may choose to move out of the area <br />due to the water quality problems and continued loss of income to the ' <br />economy of the area. The known cultural resources in the area will not <br />be impacted. <br />Alternative 2. Management Measures ' <br />8,900 Acres of nutrient management practices, <br />2,900 Acres of conservation tillage, crop residue use, and <br />polyacrylamides, ' <br />8,900 Acres of irrigation water management, <br />8,900 Acres of pest management. <br />Total Project cost is $616,000. ' <br />Components - <br />8,900 Acres of nutrient management practices, <br />' <br />2,900 Acres of crop residue use, conservation tillage, and <br />polyacrylamides, <br />8,900 Acres of irrigation water management, <br />' <br />8,900 Acres of pest management. <br />Effects <br />Implementation of management practices will more effectively use <br />irrigation water by reducing deep percolation. Reduced irrigation <br />induced erosion, sediment movement, and improved water quality of the <br />surface and ground water will also occur. The overall effect is an <br />, <br />improvement in the water quality of return flows and groundwater within <br />the watershed. <br />' <br />The management practices associated with this alternative would <br />slightly improve wildlife and fish habitat by reducing sedimentation <br />and deep percolation. The additional ground cover along with water <br />management would reduce the amount of irrigation induced erosion <br />' <br />occurring. This would decrease the amount of sediment available for <br />transport through the hydrologic system. The amount of contaminants <br />entering the ecological system from agriculture would be reduced by <br />utilizing this alternative. The impact of agriculture on endangered <br />species would be lessened due to improved water quality and <br />conservation. <br />, <br />The social and economic conditions would improve as improved water <br />application allows the agricultural producers to better meet crop needs <br />and contribute to the goal of improved water quality. The protection <br />of the soil resource base from irrigation induced erosion will also <br />have a positive effect on the local economy. The environmental , <br />conditions related to fish and wildlife will show a slight improvement <br />28 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.