My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 1:36:13 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 3:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/1/1996
Author
Bent Soil Conservation District, Prowers Soil Conservation District, Colorado State Soil Conservation Board, Fort Lyon Canal Company
Title
Limestone-Graveyard Creeks Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o543 <br />' Project Benefits <br />There will be a 32% decrease in nitrate loading to the <br />groundwater in the watershed area. <br />. Increasing Selenium levels (19.7 micrograms /liter) in the <br />Arkansas River at the Lamar gaging station will be reduced <br />' by 17 and meet EPA and State standards. <br />. Present salt loading from the watershed to the Arkansas River <br />of 116,000 tons /yr will be reduced 300. <br />Uranium concentration at the Lamar gaging station will be <br />.reduced by .4ug /l in the Arkansas River <br />Irrigation induced erosion on 8,800 acres averaging 42T /ac /yr <br />will be reduced by 88% to an acceptable level. <br />. Wetland and fisheries will be enhanced due to reduced heavy <br />metal loading. <br />Reduced sediment to creeks, drains and the Arkansas River. <br />Other Impacts <br />Land use changes (acres) -NONE <br />Environmental values changed or lost: <br />Wetlands and fisheries will be improved due to better water <br />quality from reduced heavy metals, nutrients, and sediment. <br />Erosion on prime farmland will be reduced to acceptable levels. <br />Cultural Resources - not effected. Wildlife Habitat - increase <br />in cropland wildlife habitat value. <br />Compensatory mitigation included in the plan <br />None <br />Major conclusions <br />Overall, improved surface and groundwater quality, improved human <br />health and safety, significant sediment and erosion reduction, <br />improved water quality in Arkansas River, improved wetlands and <br />fisheries from improved water quality, improved wildlife habitat, <br />reduced irrigation labor costs, reduced irrigation system <br />operation and maintenance, and improved irrigation efficiency <br />results in increased available water supply on and offsite. <br />Areas of Controversy <br />The Colorado Attorney General and the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board expressed a concern that the project would effect the flows <br />in the Arkansas River by increasing crop consumptive use. This <br />concern is due to the Kansas /Colorado water compact, as it <br />0 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.