My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2010 3:41:20 PM
Creation date
6/23/2010 1:06:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
South Platte Steering Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/6/1961
Author
South Platte Steering Committee
Title
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that sort of a thing, bearing in mind, there is <br />going to be almost certainly more upstream devel- <br />opment, we might find that we could build at a <br />different site and pay twice as much money for <br />that site and still end up, from a sound economic <br />proposition as far as what we can produce from the <br />land or the municipality, that we would be far <br />better off to spend more at the upper site or <br />lower site or whatever it might be. I won't say <br />either way." <br />MR. BARRETT: "If the state concludes that and they can sell <br />it to the Congress, certainly I would go along with <br />it." <br />MR. OSBORNE: "You've got a little selling job to do with <br />the people that are going to use the water also." <br />MR. BARRETT: "That's why I said the state." <br />MR. OSBORNE: "From that standpoint, as far as the Bureau's <br />report goes, they simply evaluate what they think <br />is the relative cost of the reservoirs with no <br />reference made to the ultimate use of the water.. <br />Is that correct, Joe ?" <br />MR. BARRETT: "Except to this extent, that we assumed that <br />the use of the reservoir, irrigation benefits <br />from the reservoir, would be, for purposes of <br />this study, the same as the benefits which we <br />derived in our earlier study of the Narrows site. <br />Because we have had no time to do anything else. <br />You can't do anything else until you define a <br />use area and if there is more market for water <br />than there is water, then I don't think the Bureau <br />of Reclamation is going to define that use area. <br />I think the State of Colorado, the people of the <br />State of Colorado, are going to define that area <br />and that will affect the benefits." <br />MR. OSBORNE: "That is correct. Now we get to the matter <br />of use and fundamentally we can start pumping up <br />from the lower Mississippi back here if it wasn't <br />for cost and the cost of our delivery lines to <br />our affected area. It may have quite an effect <br />on what you should do with your reservoir. In <br />other words, the reservoir itself is only a small <br />IME <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.