CHRONICLE & PILOT
<br />Crested Butte, CO
<br />(Gunnison County)
<br />Fri, 3,792
<br />a` ]
<br />Little love for squawfish?
<br />Gunnison water board presses
<br />for Con gressional legislation
<br />by Laura Anderson
<br />"I feel more endangered every
<br />day. '—Gunnison rancher Bill Trampe
<br />What would happen if the fed-
<br />eral government took all the water it
<br />wanted for endangered fish and the
<br />Black Canyon? Conceivably, water
<br />rights holders downstream could face
<br />shortages. They could then place calls
<br />on the Upper Gunnison Basin; some of
<br />the water in Gunnison County would
<br />be turned off. in a worst -case scenario,
<br />without proactive movement on the
<br />part of the upper basin, ranchlands
<br />could dry up for part of the year; home
<br />owners could have their water turned
<br />off.
<br />The Upper Gunnison River
<br />Water Conservancy District contends
<br />that one of the purposes of Blue Mesa
<br />Reservoir is to protect the upper basin
<br />New stream gauges
<br />The Upper Gunnison River
<br />Water Conservancy District board of
<br />directors voted to install two U.S.
<br />Geological Survey stream gauges in
<br />the basin, at a cost of $16,300, of which
<br />the district will pay half and the fed-
<br />eral government half. Before the deci-
<br />sion, the board discussed whether to
<br />use U.S. Geological Survey gauges or
<br />Colorado Division of Water Re-
<br />sources gauges. At present, the cost of
<br />each is about the same, although the
<br />maintenance and operational costs for
<br />either program could change in future
<br />years. "I think I'd rather take my
<br />chances with the feds," board member
<br />Dennis Steckel said.
<br />"What a choice," board member
<br />Le6Spann responded.
<br />The gauges will be placed on
<br />Crystal Creek and on the Tomichi
<br />River, and will let the district deter-
<br />calls, is dreaded by the water board.
<br />Such a quarterly meeting will be held
<br />in Grand Junction August 13 and 14.
<br />While the meeting may include the
<br />announcement of endangered fish
<br />flows, it will focus on releases from the
<br />Aspinall Unit into the Gunnison Basin
<br />over the next quarter year. Gunnison
<br />water district manager Tyler
<br />Martineau and board member Ralph
<br />Clark will attend.
<br />- In other endangered fish
<br />news, Martineau explained that if the
<br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decides
<br />that "sufficient progress" is not made
<br />in recovering the fish in the Upper
<br />Colorado Basin, which include the
<br />Colorado squawfish, the razorback
<br />sucker, the humpback chub and the
<br />bonytail chub, it can impose a $10 -per-
<br />acre -foot charge on depletion from
<br />new water projects to fund the Endan-
<br />gered Fish Recovery Program. This
<br />, 7harge has yet to be levied. However,
<br />now the Fish and Wildlife Service
<br />asserts that the depletion charge may
<br />be placed on existing water users, as
<br />well. Martineau said that many water
<br />users are upset and are contending
<br />that there was no such intention in the
<br />original agreement.
<br />- Arapahoe County is looking
<br />for reasons whyit has been unsuccess-
<br />ful thus farin pursuing its transmoun-
<br />tain diversion schemes in the Gunni-
<br />son basin. It has asked representatives
<br />on the Colorado Water Conservation
<br />Board, a state water board, whether
<br />the CWCB is responding to the needs
<br />of the state as a whole or favoring
<br />some parts over others. Martineau,
<br />besides being the manager of the
<br />Upper GurtnisonRiver Water Conser-
<br />vancy District,' is president of the
<br />Colorado Water Conservation Board.
<br />- The Colorado River District
<br />has announced an agreement with the
<br />City of Denver to build the $43 million
<br />Wolford Mountain Project in the
<br />Upper Colorado basin, and divert
<br />water to the Front Range, as well as
<br />supply several Western Slope coun-
<br />ties with a reliable water supply.
<br />Groundbreaking is .anticipated by
<br />next summer. Gunnison board mem-
<br />ber Lee Spann, who also sits on the
<br />Colorado River District, said he ex-
<br />pects the effect on Arapahoe County's
<br />proposal to divert water from Gunni-
<br />son County, if any, to be positive from
<br />the opposers' point of view, as it will
<br />supply additional Front Range water.
<br />- As of the end of July, the wator
<br />district had spent $129,014.73,54% of
<br />its 1992 budget of $237,900.
<br />- The various boards and coun-
<br />cils in the county will be holding a
<br />public meeting on the proposed
<br />Rocky Point hydropower project on
<br />August 19 at 7:30 p.m. in Richardson
<br />Hall in Gunnison.
<br />- The Fish and Wildlife Service
<br />will host a public meeting on Septem-
<br />ber 29 at 7:30 p.m. in Gunnison to
<br />explain the Endangered Fish Recov-
<br />ery Program.
<br />- Daries "Chuck" Lile was ap-
<br />pointed director of the Colorado
<br />Water Conservation Board and Ha-
<br />rold "Hal" Simpson was appointed
<br />state engineer.
<br />"Ben Nighthorse Campbell's office feels the
<br />operational approach would
<br />raise fewer red
<br />flags with George Miller and the environmen-
<br />talists who are pushing the Bureau of Reclama-
<br />tion to cut federal water subsidies and enforce
<br />the Reclamation Reform Act," Tyler Martineau
<br />told the board. "Also, it is simpler."
<br />from such calls, and that this was
<br />mine how much water is flowing
<br />promised in the 1950s when the Aspi-
<br />there. They are part of the district's
<br />nail Unit, which includes Blue Mesa,
<br />program to develop its water rights.
<br />the Crystal Reservoir and the Morrow
<br />Board member Ramon Reed
<br />Point Reservoir, was approved. Mon-
<br />suggested asking the Colorado River
<br />daynight , the waterboard.considered
<br />District to pay for half the cost of the
<br />the latestofa series ofdraftsoflegisla-
<br />gauges. He read one of the Colorado
<br />tion that would make this protection a
<br />River District's written policies,
<br />law, if passed by Congress. The board
<br />. which states that the Colorado River
<br />hopes that Representative Ben Night -
<br />District will split the costs of gauges
<br />horse Campbell will attach this legis-
<br />with water conservancy districts if
<br />lation to his bill making the Black
<br />they are leading to water projects.
<br />Canyon of the Gunnison a national
<br />However, other board members
<br />park.
<br />felt it a poor idea to ask the Colorado
<br />The current language would
<br />River District for cost sharing at this
<br />allow the upper basin a certain
<br />late date, especially since the Colo -
<br />amount of storage in Blue Mesa Reser-
<br />rado River District paid the entire cost
<br />voir. Ifthe downstream rights holders
<br />ofa gauge on the East River earlier this
<br />placed calls, the basin could use its
<br />year. The board agreed to ask the
<br />water in storage to meet these calls,
<br />River District to pay half the operation
<br />rather than turn off faucets.
<br />and maintenance costs, which total
<br />But Monday night, Water Dis-
<br />trict Manager Tyler Martineau told
<br />$14,600 a year for the two gauges.
<br />Bonytail chub & other business
<br />the board that Campbell's office has
<br />- The Upper Gunnison
<br />expressed interest in a different ap-
<br />River
<br />Water Conservancy District consid-
<br />proach, the "operational approach."
<br />ered scheduling work sessions on
<br />This language would direct the Bu-
<br />topics such as augmentation of the
<br />reau of Reclamation to manage Blue
<br />basin's water supply. However, the
<br />Mesa without harming the upper
<br />board questioned whether an atten-
<br />basin, avoiding storage issues. "Dan
<br />dance requirement which states that
<br />McCullough, of Ben Nighthorse
<br />board members cannot miss two con -
<br />Campbell's office, feels the opera-
<br />secutive meetings or three meetings
<br />tional approach would raise fewer red
<br />total in a yearapplies to worksessions.
<br />flags with George Miller (head of the
<br />They decided to seek an opinion from
<br />House Interior Committee] and the
<br />Judge Goldsmith before planning
<br />environmentalists who are pushing
<br />more work sessions.
<br />the Bureau of Reclamation to cut fed-
<br />- The Fish and Wildlife Service
<br />eral water subsidies and enforce the
<br />has agreed to give six months notice at
<br />Reclamation Reform Act," Martineau
<br />one of the Grand Junction office of the
<br />told the board. "Also, it is simpler."
<br />Bureau of Reclamation's quarterly
<br />The board voted to send a draft
<br />meetings before it begins increased
<br />of the operational approach legisla-
<br />flows to help endangered fish. This
<br />tion composed by board member
<br />announcement, which could result in
<br />Ralph Clark to Ben Nighthorse
<br />greater demands on the upperGunni=
<br />Campbell's office.
<br />son Basin as well as possible water
<br />
|