Laserfiche WebLink
DElV R & THE WEST ,WE DNESDAY, MARon 30, 2005 <br />House lawmakers vow to reg roup: ' <br />gr p The issues riot dead" <br />Thegoal is to clarify.state water Diane Hoppe, R- Sterling, said she would <br />law on recreation appropriations be working with Democrats in the coming <br />versus the needs of industry days to come up with a different approach, <br />agriculture and development. one that might,eniq more support from <br />House Democrats. <br />"The issue's not dead," she said after re- <br />ceiving permission from Democratic <br />House Speaker Andrew Romanoff to file a <br />new bill. "we're going to continue work - <br />ing <br />She and Democratic House Majority <br />Leader Alice Madden of Boulder will meet <br />soon to discuss what compromises can be <br />struck to make Colorado water law clearer <br />on the appropriation of water for recre- <br />ation, they said <br />"There's got to be a happy medium <br />where we're not pitting ,agriculture <br />against recreation," Madden said. "I think <br />there is.a need, and we'll address iv <br />The need fou new law, the lawmakers <br />said, was emphasize4 by a footnote in a re- <br />cent Colorado. Supreme t;vurt decision <br />that asked lawmakers to make water law <br />less vague when it comes to, recreational <br />use. <br />Democrats dominated Tuesday's floor <br />debate, decrying 0'62 as anti - tourism. <br />By Jim Hughes <br />Denver Post Staff Writer <br />Lawmakers killed a controversial cap on <br />water allocations for whitewater recre- <br />ation Tuesday, but Democrats and.Repub- <br />licans say they are going back to the draw- <br />ing board to see if they can come up with a <br />compromise. <br />The sponsor of the bill, Sen. Jack Taylor, <br />R- Steamboat Springs, called the failure of <br />Senate Bill 62 in Tuesday's House voice <br />vote "a tragedy for the future of Colorado" <br />because all water interests in the state <br />could be made vulnerable by towns that <br />seek future water rights for whitewater <br />kayak play parks. <br />But at least a discussion has been <br />opened on the issue, he added. <br />Existing whitewater courses had been <br />exempted from the measure. <br />The House co- sponsor of the bill, Rep: <br />Rep. Tom Plant, D- Nederland, a former <br />whitewater guide on the Arkansas River, <br />argued that a 350 cubic - feet - per- second <br />cap on whitewater allocations was an "ab- <br />solutely idiotic" thing to pit intoaw. <br />The gradient and chamiW $, e o�each in- <br />dividual river has to, be . d gi&red to <br />know how much water is enough to create <br />a viable whitewater experience, he said. <br />But opponents, mostly Republicans, said <br />that whitewater play parks should not <br />threaten the water needs of agriculture, in- <br />dustry and residential development. <br />"If there's any left (after those uses), <br />then we can.have recreational use," said <br />Rep. Ray Rose, R- Montrose. <br />Hoppe said she expects. the new bill to <br />be written without the 350 cis limit that <br />Democrats opposed so strongly and to <br />som how emphasize the municipal needs <br />that V any lawmakers have to answer to in' <br />the districts. <br />" issue is extremely important, espe- <br />cialy to all those people that represent a <br />me opolitan area" at the Capitol, she said. <br />Staff writer Jim Hughes can be reached at <br />3 or jhughes @denverpostcom. <br />