Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />Silverthorne <br />floats kayak <br />park, troubles <br />Denver Water <br />By Steve Lipsher <br />Denver Post Staff Writer <br />Frisco — A proposal build a <br />kayak park just below the Dillon <br />Reservoir was met 'Wednesday <br />with concern over the prospect <br />that it could affect Denver's fu -. <br />ture water supply. <br />In seeking a new water right, <br />Silverthome's proposal would <br />ensure minimum stream flows <br />through the Blue River on sum - <br />mer days and peak flows on holi- <br />day weekends, but it would kick <br />in only when is enough wa- <br />ter to make boating worthwhile. <br />Using water rights for white- <br />water parks has become an in- <br />creasingly contentious issue in <br />the state, Silverthorne water it- <br />torney David Robbins told the <br />Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, meeting in Frisco. <br />"Whether we agree philosophi- <br />cally ... or if we don't agree with <br />them, they are a- matter of fact <br />and a matter of life,' he said. <br />Representatives of the Denver " <br />Water Board, however, suggest- <br />ed that the water rights -being <br />sought could interfere with the <br />city's operation of its water -sup- <br />ply system, even though Silver - <br />thome's claim would be consld- <br />eyed a "junior water right. <br />Under Colorado law, watnr <br />rights are property that can lie <br />sold and traded, and they are <br />based on seniority: Holders ''of j <br />the oldest water rights trump all <br />other user's upstream and are en- ' <br />titled to their share first. <br />In 2001, the state legislature de- <br />termined that municipalities <br />could seek water rights for <br />whitewater parks, which haue <br />sprung up or been proposed <br />more than a doyen Colorado <br />communities. <br />But the efforts have continual-. <br />ly met with resistance from tradi- <br />tional water users, for whom it is <br />nearly antithetical to allow pre - <br />cious water to flo y� away fpr <br />recreation. <br />Water in the Dillon Reservoir, <br />which serves Denver's 1 million <br />municipal users,- is drawn <br />through the Roberts Tunnel into <br />the South Platte drainage; one of <br />numerous "trans- mountain di- <br />versions" that pipe mountain wa- <br />ter to the Front Range. , <br />Denver's spider web of pipes <br />and. complex agreements with <br />other users means that watevin <br />its other mountain storage facili- <br />ties is sometimes tapped for <br />downstream users to substitute <br />for the amount the city draws <br />from Dillon. <br />As a result, the Denver Water <br />Board is concerned that the Sil- <br />verthorne proposal could hinder <br />the city's ability to use.its full al- <br />lotment of water without infring- <br />ing on its obligations to down- <br />stream users.' <br />Silverthorne officials, though, <br />point out that the water right <br />Wouldn't displace any senior <br />rights and that Denver. is trying <br />to stake a claim for future wa- <br />ter -use possibilities that don't ex- <br />ist in law. <br />The utility and Silverthorne <br />are trying to . hammer out an <br />agreement. In the meantime, the <br />Water Conservation Board must <br />make a recommendation to the <br />state water court about whether <br />to allow the whitewater park, <br />• , The town of Silverthorne,-&I- <br />though a- -small community, is <br />just as entitigd to obtain a water <br />right as anps large community <br />said Robbins, taking careful aim <br />at Denver. <br />