My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation Water Rights - "The Inside Story"
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Recreation Water Rights - "The Inside Story"
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2010 11:45:15 AM
Creation date
6/17/2010 1:47:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD
State
CO
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Glenn E. Porzak, Steven J. Bushong, P. Fritz Hollerman, Lawrence J. MacDonnell
Title
Recreation Water Rights - "The Inside Story"
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreational In- Channel Diversions (RICDs) Glenn E. Porzak, Esq. <br />1800 cfs for up to eight event days in June; (2) 1400 cfs for up to thirty consecutive days picked each <br />year from the Friday before Memorial Day to the end of June ( "30 -Day Period "), except for event days <br />during that time; (3) 700 cfs from July 1 through August 15, and any time between the Friday before <br />Memorial Day and the end of June that is not part of the 30 -Day Period; and (4) 250 cfs from March 15 <br />to the Thursday before Memorial Day, and from August 16 to November 15. <br />Various objectors asserted they reasonably anticipated filing for exchanges upstream of the <br />boating parks in the near future. These exchanges totaled approximately 140,000 acre -feet and are <br />junior to the boating park water rights. As part of the settlement, however, Chaffee County agreed that <br />so long as certain conditions were met, it would reduce its call during the 30 -Day Period (but not event <br />days) from 1400 cfs to as low as 1200 cfs, to the extent its water rights prevented these future <br />exchanges. This 200 cfs reduction (roughly 12,000 acre -feet if over the entire 30 day period) is <br />available to any user in priority. In addition, under certain very limited conditions, where some water <br />users are seeking to replace storage levels reduced by drought conditions, Chaffee County agreed to <br />reduce its call on event days to as low as 1500 cfs, and during the 30 -Day period to as low as 1100 cfs <br />on weekends and 1000 cfs on weekdays. <br />Negotiations in the case were complicated by the Upper Arkansas Voluntary Flow Management <br />Program ( "VFMP "), a year -to -year, voluntary flow management program whereby the Bureau of <br />Reclamation, in concurrence with the SEWCD and CDNR, operates upstream reservoir releases, <br />primarily involving trans- mountain water, so as to manage flows in the Arkansas River above Pueblo <br />Reservoir for recreation and fishery purposes. Although the boating park water rights are distinct from <br />the VFMP, some parties were concerned that opposition to the boating park water rights would <br />jeopardize this voluntary agreement. To help ensure consistency between the VFMP and the water <br />rights, Chaffee County agreed to use the same river gage used in the VFMP to administer both boating <br />park water rights. Chaffee County further tailored portions of its water rights to be consistent with the <br />target flow levels of the VFMP. This included 700 cfs from July 1 — August 15, 250 cfs on the shoulder <br />seasons. These recreational water rights work in tandem with the VFMP by protecting the native flows <br />that the program is designed to supplement. In short, although Chaffee County cannot call for storage <br />releases under the VFMP to satisfy its water rights, it can prevent junior water rights from diminishing <br />river flows below these targets. <br />With the assistance of SEWCD, CDNR, Trout Unlimited, Arkansas River Outfitters Association <br />and others, negotiations in the Chaffee County case resulted in a five -year VFMP agreement that <br />provides more certainty for local outfitters and businesses. As part of the larger settlement agreement, <br />there was also a greater commitment obtained from water users to exercise water rights in a manner <br />consistent with the VFMP and commitments from some parties on limitations with respect to water <br />rights that would otherwise be senior to the RICDs. <br />The CWCB re- convened its hearing in March, 2006, during which it heard evidence on the <br />settlement agreements that, although not signed, had largely been approved in concept. Based on these <br />negotiated agreements, the CWCB had little choice but to recommend approval of the application. <br />Thereafter, the settlements were finalized and a final decree issued without a trial. <br />XII. The General Assembly Weighs in Again: Senate Bill 37 <br />CLE INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE K -31 ■ COLORADO WATER LAW <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.