Laserfiche WebLink
f. Decreed Amounts The Court finds that the City is entitled to an absolute water <br />right at each of the two RICD structures comprising the Boating Park in the quantities set forth <br />below, as follows: <br />Time <br />April <br />May <br />May <br />June <br />June <br />July <br />Jul <br />August <br />Period <br />15 -30 <br />1 -15 <br />16 -31 <br />1 -15 <br />16 -30 <br />1 -15 <br />16 -31 <br />1- 15 <br />Flows <br />400 <br />650 <br />1000 <br />1400 <br />650 <br />250 <br />100 <br />95 <br />(cfs) <br />The above amounts claimed are limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The <br />Boating Park RICD right is not entitled to divert, capture, or control water at the two diversion <br />structures in the Boating Park between 8:00 p.m. and the following 8:00 a.m., except and <br />provided that the City is entitled as a part of such absolute water right to the above amounts <br />during the hours of 8:00 a.m. until midnight on up to 10 days between April 15 and July 15 for <br />nighttime competitive events if each such right is first designated in writing by the City at least 5 <br />days in advance thereof to the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 6, and provided further <br />that if the ending time for such a nighttime competitive event is earlier than midnight, then the <br />diversion under such water right shall end at the ending time of such event. The foregoing shall <br />not prevent a call being placed outside of the hourly limits in order to produce the decreed <br />amounts during the hourly limits given the transit times of water as reasonably determined by the <br />Division Engineer. Any call after July 15 shall not be honored unless it increases the flow at the <br />Boating Park RICD structures to at least 85 cfs. <br />g. Diversion and Control The design capacity of the two RICD structures is greater <br />than 1400 cfs, which allows flows of that amount to be fully captured by the high flow channel <br />constructed into each structure without overtopping. Flow rates up to and greater than 1400 cfs <br />are efficiently controlled, concentrated and diverted, without waste, to create waves and jets of <br />water, self - scouring pools, hydraulic holes, large changes in current direction, and whitewater <br />features that are used by kayakers and other boaters and inner tubers for the City's intended <br />recreational purposes. A low flow channel constructed into each structure controls and <br />concentrates water at low flow to allow passage of boats, inner tubes and other recreational water <br />craft through each structure at lower flows. <br />In view of the foregoing, the Court finds that the RICD structures at Charlie's Hole and <br />D -Hole control, concentrate and direct the flow of water through the structures in a manner that <br />constitutes a diversion under C.R.S. § 37- 92- 103(7)(2004), at all flow rates up to the maximum <br />amounts claimed in paragraph 6.f. above. See also Colorado Water Conservation Bd v. Upper <br />Gunnison River Water Conservancy Dist, 109 P.3d 585, 591 -92, 598 (Colo. 2005)(hereafter <br />"Gunnison "). Accordingly, the Court finds that the Boating Park structures are capable of <br />efficiently diverting and controlling the water flows without waste for the claimed amounts. <br />-4- <br />tk0236 <br />