Laserfiche WebLink
By Erin McIntyre <br />s <br />_ 11111 Al <br />!;'yrlU!Ji1111 ii�IJ11J1I�111J <br />V1 I <br />To most people driving on U.S. Highway 50 west of Gunnison, the stretch of water just west <br />of town near the Twin Bridges is just another fast - moving section of the Gunnison River. Even <br />a trained eye might have a hard time telling that beneath the water's surface are hundreds of <br />boulders strategically placed to make a whitewater park. <br />On spring and summer aftern <br />tourists might observe brightly <br />ored kayaks bobbing in and out <br />waves, and applaud Gunnison f <br />recreation - friendly community. W <br />not apparent to casual observer <br />the hours invested in legal wra <br />and community dialogue that wen <br />building the park and obtaining <br />water right necessary to give this <br />a priority over some of the other f <br />water uses in the valley. <br />Outside of the courtroom and b <br />the water board meetings, the resu <br />this hard- fought battle beg the que <br />How does the Gunnison communit <br />about its new recreational hotspot? <br />Making Sense'= <br />By the time the park was built, <br />of the community was in favor o <br />project, says George Sibley, a prof <br />at Western State College and organi <br />the annual Gunnison Water Worksh <br />oons, Sibley says many locals support - <br />col- ed the whitewater park because they <br />of the thought gaining a water right for the <br />or its park assured that the water could not <br />hat is be diverted to the Front Range. In the <br />s are past, water developers have eyed the <br />ngling Gunnison River basin for projects such as <br />t into Union Park, a proposed 1.2 million acre - <br />the foot reservoir. Although Union Park's <br />park proponents lost a Colorado Supreme <br />uture Court battle in 1998, when the court <br />declared there was not enough water for <br />be <br />the project, many locals still fear losing <br />Its of water to transmountain diversions. <br />stion "Frankly, that was a major reason for <br />y feel getting local support for it," says Sibley. <br />"It assures the water will have to be in <br />the river at least for that far." <br />But not everyone in Gunnison agrees. <br />most Rikki Santarelli, former Gunnison County <br />f the attorney and commissioner, was on the <br />essor commission when the county decided to <br />zer of build the park on its own land, and sup - <br />op. ported the effort. Now Santarelli feels that <br />the park's water rights may actually hurt <br />the valley in the long run by hindering resi- <br />dential and other development upstream. <br />He says if Front Range communities <br />want water from the Gunnison Basin, <br />a kayak park won't stop them because <br />they have more political clout and money <br />than the small mountain town. What the <br />kayak park hinders, says Santarelli, is <br />development in the Gunnison Valley that <br />could benefit the community. <br />"(The whitewater park) is kind of at <br />the bottom of the valley," says Santarelli, <br />who has some clients who are develop- <br />ers. "So, everybody who wants to make <br />any change in the water right above that <br />kayak park has to come up with a way to <br />augment the stream. <br />Under Colorado law, junior water <br />right holders are allowed to use water <br />out of priority, but they must replace, or <br />augment, what was used with the same <br />quantity and suitable quality of water. An <br />augmentation plan identifies how, where; Amd <br />