Laserfiche WebLink
County's RICD application approved by state water board <br />t i <br />home : news : news <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />3/23/2006 8:48:00 AM <br />Email this article • Print this article <br />County's RICD <br />County residents sign petition against RICD <br />application <br />Claiming the Chaffee County recreational water right isn't worth the <br />ved <br />appro roved b state <br />price, county resident Chuck Reavis delivered a petition Tuesday <br />y <br />requesting commissioners immediately stop spending money on the <br />water board <br />application. <br />consideration agreements <br />The petition, submitted during the public comment period of the regular <br />b Jason Starr <br />y <br />commissioners' meeting, contains 150 -200 signatures, Reavis said. It <br />"river <br />and the many objectors in <br />requests commissioners seek reimbursement from interests" for <br />Mail Staff Writer <br />money already spent on the water right application. <br />Unanimous approval for <br />pp <br />Commissioners began researching the possibility of applying for a <br />recreational in channel diversion water right in 2004. <br />recommendation of the <br />"We're not dipping into reserves," commissioner Tim Glenn said. "The <br />Chaffee County water right <br />Like other governments that have sought — and in some cases <br />application protecting river <br />received — similar water rights, Chaffee County is trying to protect river <br />through water court with this <br />flow in its whitewater parks. <br />flow in local whitewater <br />parks came Wednesday <br />Parks in Chaffee County are located in downtown areas of Salida and <br />from the Colorado Water <br />Buena Vista. <br />Conservation Board. <br />Commissioners believe the water right will ensure water flows through <br />the county during river season and secure the economy that river <br />Eight of 15 members of the <br />recreation supports. <br />conservation board were <br />Money spend by the county so far in attorney and engineering fees for <br />present at the meeting in <br />the RICD application was disputed at Tuesday's meeting. <br />Rifle to vote on the <br />The amount of $400,000 appears on the petition, which petitioners <br />application. <br />believe is too big a drain on the county budget. <br />The conservation board <br />„We the undersigned taxpayers of Chaffee County can no longer <br />accept the expenditure of county funds associated with the (RICD) <br />recommendation regarding <br />filing," the petition reads. <br />the county recreational in <br />channel diversion <br />"We cannot afford the enormous drain on our county budget last year, <br />this year and for the foreseeable future." <br />application took into <br />consideration agreements <br />Commissioners said the amount spent to date on the application is <br />involving Chaffee County <br />$217,000 and $220,000 is budgeted for legal expenses during 2006. <br />and the many objectors in <br />Commissioners countered a claim by petitioners that money is being <br />the case. <br />spent from reserves for the RICD, saying the budget for 2006 is <br />balanced even with the projected legal expenses. <br />It cleared the way for <br />"We're not dipping into reserves," commissioner Tim Glenn said. "The <br />presentation in water court. <br />county will still be in good financial shape." <br />"We think it will move right <br />through water court with this <br />recommendation," Chaffee County Commissioner Jerry <br />Mallett, who attended the meeting, said. <br />i <br />http: / /www.themountaimnail.com/main. asp? SectionID= 4 &SubSectionID= 4 &ArticleID =7... 3/29/2006 <br />