Laserfiche WebLink
Funding shortfall means whitewater park unlikely <br />Funding shortfall means whitewater park unlikely <br />Supporters currently $1.9M short in funding <br />By MIKE WIGGINS and KYLENE KIANG The Daily Sentinel <br />Wednesday, March 14, 2007 <br />Pagel of 3 <br />RANTS <br />The U.S. Bureau of Reclam -ation on Tuesday slapped a $2.9 million price tag on a proposed whitewater <br />park on the Colorado River east of Palisade, raising questions and doubts about whether backers of the <br />park can raise money in time for the project's April deadline. <br />"There's no one more disappointed than we are now," Palisade Mayor Doug Edwards said. The town <br />and its partner in the project, the Western Association To Enjoy Rivers, have raised about $1 million so <br />far and will have until April 12, or 30 days, to come up with the remaining $1.9 million. <br />"It seems like we've been fundraising forever," said Edwards, who said he felt like he was "up a creek <br />without a paddle, without a life jacket and without a boat." <br />'11.9 million really feels like a bit much," he said, adding it probably will be difficult for Palisade to <br />generate that amount. <br />"We're a small town ... At this point it looks kind of hopeless," Edwards said. <br />If the funds do come in, the Bureau of Reclamation will build the whitewater park in conjunction with <br />its existing plans to construct a fish passage at the Price -Stubb Dam at the mouth of De Beque Canyon. <br />Regardless of Palisade's fundraising efforts, federal officials will proceed with building the fish passage <br />late this summer, in hopes of completing the passage by May 2008. <br />The cost of the fish passage and whitewater park would be $12 million, while the cost of the fish <br />passage alone is $9.7 million. The $2.9 million price tag for the park includes non - contract and <br />contingency costs, Bureau of Reclamation area manager Carol DeAngelis said. <br />The original estimated cost of the whitewater park ranged from $400,000 to $600,000. The Bureau of <br />Reclamation later indicated the price could be closer to $2 to $2.5 million. <br />In a letter to Grand Junction City Council members last fall, Palisade Town Administrator Tim Sarmo <br />said he thought modifications to the design of the fish passage and park could reduce the cost of the park <br />to around $1 million. <br />The bureau listed the combined whitewater park and fish passage as its preferred alternative for dealing <br />with the Price -Stubb Dam. The dam must be removed or altered for four species of endangered fish <br />the Colorado pikeminnow, razorback sucker, humpback chub and bonytail to be restored to their <br />http: / /cox.printthis. clickability. com /pt /cpt? action =cpt &title = Funding +shortfall +means +wh... 3/14/2007 <br />