My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreational In-Channel Diversion Rules (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Recreational In-Channel Diversion Rules (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2010 2:36:20 PM
Creation date
6/17/2010 11:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD Legislation - SB 37
State
CO
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Recreational In-Channel Diversion Rules
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage <br />which may be utilized by those who would place the water to consumptive <br />beneficial use; <br />iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for <br />consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; <br />V. Exchange opportunities within the state that may be adversely impacted by the <br />existence of the RICD; <br />vi. Whether the basin is over - appropriated; <br />vii. The effect on other decreed, existing undecreed, or reasonably foreseeable uses of <br />the amount of water claimed; <br />viii. Whether a RICD shields waters from a consumptive use that would otherwise be <br />available under a particular compact; <br />ix. Whether beneficial consumptive water use opportunities upstream from the <br />claimed RICD would further develop Colorado's compact entitlements and would <br />be impaired by applicant's sought for stream flow amounts; and, <br />X. What provisions in the application are proposed for reducing or canceling the <br />RICD? <br />b. Whether the exercise of the RICD would cause material injury to existing ISF water <br />rights. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />i. The nature and extent of the ISF in the proposed reach or any affected <br />downstream reach; <br />ii. The timing and duration of the RICD as such may relate to the specific natural <br />environment for which the ISF was decreed; <br />iii. Whether the RICD, or administration of the RICD, would negatively impact the <br />natural environment for which the ISF was decreed; and, <br />iv. Whether during the construction of the RICD structures, the construction may <br />cause material injury to the ISF or the natural environment for which the ISF was <br />decreed. <br />c. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICD, in the amounts claimed, would <br />promote— maximum utilization of the waters of the State. The board, in making this <br />finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: <br />i. Whether there are any probable future upstream junior appropriations for direct <br />diversion or storage; <br />ii. Whether there are any probable future changes, transfers, or exchanges of water <br />rights from points of diversion downstream of the reach affected by the RICD to <br />points upstream of or in the reach affected by the RICD; <br />iii. Whether existing federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected <br />by the RICD; <br />iv. Whether a reasonable and efficient means is to be utilized to use, divert, capture <br />and control the water for a RICD so as to minimize its call upon the river and <br />avoid waste; <br />V. Whether a reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as <br />determined by levels of current use and/or estimates of future use; <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.