My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Struggles to Define Rules for Recreational Water Use
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Colorado Struggles to Define Rules for Recreational Water Use
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2010 2:17:18 PM
Creation date
6/17/2010 10:16:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD Legislation - SB 37
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/5/2001
Author
New York Times
Title
Colorado Struggles to Define Rules for Recreational Water Use
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colorado Struggles to Define Rules for Recreational Water Use Page 2 of 3 <br />Customer Service <br />state." <br />YOUR PROF r: <br />a <br />Review Profile <br />But the Colorado Water Conservation Board, which oversees water use <br />E -Mail Options <br />Log Out <br />throughout the state and has not dealt with recreational water issues, has said <br />most minor requests for recreational water use and submit its finding to the <br />that the flow the judge permitted is available only nine days a year and that the <br />Text Version <br />allocation is too great. <br />million in business last year, up from $89 million in 1995, according to the E <br />"In a semiarid state, you've got to have adequate water," said Dan McAuliffe, <br />deputy director of the conservation board, which could appeal the ruling to the <br />State Supreme Court. "We're seeing limitations in the future with more growth <br />or if there is a prolonged drought." <br />This spring the state enacted a law requiring the board to review all but the <br />most minor requests for recreational water use and submit its finding to the <br />water court judge hearing the case. <br />Water sports are an industry in Colorado. River rafting alone generated $122 <br />Ep <br />million in business last year, up from $89 million in 1995, according to the E <br />Colorado River Outfitters Association. t <br />the i <br />R ated <br />While the main tourism draw in Golden is the Coors brewery also known # <br /># Over <br />for its water use — the water park brings in an estimated $2 million to $3 i <br />invest <br />million a year. * <br />*24/7s <br />In another legal battle over water, the issue is not quantity but location. 3 <br />A rancher in Gunnison, Colo., is suing a rafting company whose boating tours <br />cross his property. <br />At issue is the right to float. In Wyoming, New Mexico and other Western <br />states, the law gives the public a clear right to use rivers and streams <br />recreationally as long as they enter them from public land. <br />�'Earro <br />The law in Colorado is not clear on this point. A law enacted in 1977, a <br />decision by the Colorado Supreme Court in 1979 and a 1983 opinion from the Adi <br />state attorney general have in part contradicted each other. As a result, each List your r <br />side has interpreted the law in its own way, with custom holding that boaters NYTimes. <br />can float or paddle through private property as long as they do not touch the <br />riverbed or banks. Post a Jot <br />file://C:\ WINDOWS \Temporary %20Intemet %20Files\ Colorado %20Struggles %20to %20Defin... 7/6/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.