My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Item 14, Request for Approval of Policy Regarding RICD's
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Agenda Item 14, Request for Approval of Policy Regarding RICD's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2010 2:13:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2010 2:54:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD
State
CO
Date
9/12/2003
Author
Tom Browning, CWCB
Title
Agenda Item 14, Request for Approval of Policy Regarding RICD's
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that the CWCB accepts responsibility for final design, construction, operation, and <br />safety of the boating course. <br />4. Physical Characteristics of an Appropriate Stream Reach for an RICD <br />In order for the applicant and the CWCB to assess the appropriateness of a proposed <br />RICD stream reach, the CWCB recommends a minimum average slope of 0.5% for a <br />destination - oriented RICD stream reach based on hydraulic fundamentals and <br />engineering considerations. This suggestion is also based on stream channel information <br />from existing boating courses in Colorado. It is certainly possible that a recreational <br />facility could be constructed on a stream having an average slope of less than 0.5 %, <br />depending on the intended use. <br />The designer may choose to incorporate physical features to increase the localized <br />slope and enhance the experience within the RICD stream reach. Such features, <br />however, should not create adverse impacts and should avoid increased flooding <br />conditions as discussed above. Natural stream reaches with inadequate slope can <br />present challenging design considerations for destination - oriented boating facilities, as <br />stream power is an important factor in determining the success of a destination - <br />oriented boating experience. <br />As an alternative to the suggested minimum slope, the applicant may choose to evaluate <br />the appropriateness of the RICD reach by computing a Performance Index (PI). A <br />Performance Index of less than 75 may suggest an inappropriate stream reach for a <br />destination - oriented RICD (see Appendix for details related to Performance Index). In <br />the event that the applicant is seeking an RICD for a recreational experience other than <br />a destination - oriented boating course, the application will be reviewed accordingly. <br />The CWCB also suggests a boating course length of approximately 700 to 1000 feet for <br />destination - oriented courses. This is based on information collected from existing <br />courses in Colorado and around the world, and has been suggested by boating course <br />design experts. <br />The CWCB will review RICD applications on a case -by -case basis and will consider <br />factors and circumstances brought forth by the applicant as part of the assessment to <br />determine the appropriateness of the reach of a requested RICD water right. <br />5. Flow Rate Guidelines for an RICD <br />The CWCB recommends that an RICD Flow Rate appropriate for a particular <br />recreational facility should not be based upon the existing or proposed configuration of <br />a particular course. Rather, the CWCB recommends that determination of RICD Flow <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.