Laserfiche WebLink
5. Optional Pre - Application Process <br />Prior to submitting an Application to the water court or to the Board, the Board encourages <br />the Applicant to meet with Staff to discuss the proposed RICD application and the procedures <br />to be followed by the Board to review the application. Staff will provide input regarding how <br />the proposed application can meet the intent of the RICD rules. <br />6. Submissions Required from an Applicant <br />Within 30 days after filing an application for a RICD with any water court, an Applicant shall <br />submit a copy of the application to the Board Office, pursuant to section 37 -92- 102(5), C.R.S. <br />(2001). <br />7. Required Findings <br />The Board is required to make certain findings about RICDs. If the Board determines that the <br />amount of water sought for a RICD does not represent the stream flow necessary to provide a <br />reasonable recreation experience in and on the water and/or that the RICD does not divert, <br />capture, and control water in its natural course or location with physical control structures, <br />then the Board shall note that determination in its written. recommendation to the water court <br />and specifically preserve the Board's authority to argue these issues in water court. Section <br />37- 92402(6)(b), C.R.S. (2001) requires the Board to make the following findings: <br />a. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICD would impair the ability of <br />Colorado to fully develop and place to consumptive Beneficial Use its Compact <br />Entitlements. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, <br />the following: <br />i. The amount and location of remaining unappropriated Compact Entitlement <br />waters in the basin in question and at the RICD point of diversion; <br />ii. The proximity of the RICD to the state line; <br />iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage <br />which may be utilized by those who would place the water to consumptive <br />beneficial use; <br />iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for <br />consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; and, <br />V. Exchange opportunities within the state that may be adversely impacted by the <br />existence of the RICD. <br />b. Whether the RICD appropriation is for an appropriate reach of stream for the intended <br />use. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />i. The nature of the recreational activity for which the RICD is sought; <br />3 <br />