My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: Agenda Item 9, Board Meeting, Recreational Instream Flows, Policy Discussion
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Re: Agenda Item 9, Board Meeting, Recreational Instream Flows, Policy Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2010 11:04:26 AM
Creation date
6/16/2010 1:56:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/17/2000
Author
Dan McAuliffe, Dan Merriman, Ted Kowalski, CWCB
Title
Re: Agenda Item 9, Board Meeting, Recreational Instream Flows, Policy Discussion
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i+ k <br />0 • <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866 -4474 <br />www. dnr. state. co. us/cwcb <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E.Walcher <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Executive Director <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Acting CWCB <br />To: Colorado Water Conservation Board Members Director <br />From: Dan McAuliffe <br />Dan Merriman <br />Ted Kowalski <br />Date: July 17, 2000 <br />Re: Agenda Item 9, July 24 -25, 2000, Board Meeting -- <br />Stream and Lake Protection — Recreational instream flows, policy discussion <br />GENERAL BACKGROUND <br />At the May 2000 CWCB meeting, the CWCB discussed the recent trend by <br />municipalities to appropriate instream flow water rights for boating and/or piscatorial <br />purposes ( "recreational instream flows "). Golden, Littleton, and the Upper Gunnison <br />River Water Conservancy District have recently filed for recreational instream flows. <br />Other Colorado municipalities have developed boating courses, and their water rights <br />applications may soon follow. In a recent law review article, the authors commented on <br />Golden's 1998 application: "[W]hile the water court may be precluded from considering <br />the public policy implications of granting Golden what amounts to a 1 ge instream flow <br />right and a gatekeeping function over an entire watershed, the legislature or the Supreme <br />Court through judicial interpretation of waste and reasonable use, or a review of City of <br />Thornton v. City of Ft. Collins, may soon be required to address this important issue." <br />Such a "wait and see" approach could prove highly detrimental to the people of <br />Colorado. The purpose of this paper is to generate a discussion about recreational flows, <br />and their proper integration into Colorado water law. <br />Current legal framework <br />Under Colorado water law, the State of Colorado may appropriate "minimum <br />flows between specific points on natural streams as are required to preserve the natural <br />environment to a reasonable degree." Section 37- 92- 103(4), C.R.S. (1999). This <br />exclusive authority is explicitly given to the CWCB in section 37- 92- 102(3). The statute <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.