My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SB 01-216, Concerning RICD's and Questions and Answers
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
SB 01-216, Concerning RICD's and Questions and Answers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 1:09:56 PM
Creation date
6/14/2010 10:15:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB 01-216
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/1/2001
Author
CWCB
Title
SB 01-216, Concerning RICD's and Questions and Answers
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Bill Owens, Governor <br />Greg Walcher, DNR Executive Director <br />Rod Kuharich, CWCB Director April 2001 <br />SB 01 -216, CONCERNING IN- CHANNEL <br />RECREATIONAL DIVERSIONS <br />Background <br />In 1992 the Colorado Supreme Court held that entities <br />may obtain a water right for a flow within a stream <br />channel if the entity controls the water to serve the <br />intended purpose. <br />The decision allowed Fort Collins to obtain a water right <br />for 30 cfs in the summer and 5 -cfs in the winter for a boat <br />chute located on the Cache La Poudre River. <br />In 1999 another modest decree was awarded to the City <br />of Littleton for 100 cfs for its kayaking course on the <br />South Platte River. <br />In 1998, the City of Golden applied for an appropriation <br />of up to 1000 cfs for flows in Clear Creek — essentially <br />all the available flow in Clear Creek. <br />Because "control" is not statutorily defined and the Fort <br />Collins decision is very broad, entities can now claim <br />control without having done much to the stream. <br />In December 2000, four similar applications were filed <br />by Aspen, Breckenridge, the Eagle County Water and <br />Sanitation District (Vail), and by the Browns (citizens in <br />water division 4). <br />Boat chutes exist or are being designed in: <br />Boulder <br />Denver <br />Durango <br />Fort Collins <br />Golden <br />Grand Junction <br />Gunnison <br />Littleton (South Suburban) <br />Littleton (Union Avenue) <br />Ouray <br />Pueblo <br />Salida <br />Steamboat Springs Vail <br />Bill Summary <br />Municipalities are filing for water <br />rights for recreational boating. <br />Individuals and the federal <br />government may also file for such <br />rights. The CWCB recognizes the <br />benefits to communities of having <br />recreational facilities and can play an <br />important role in reviewing water <br />rights applications prior to <br />submission to water court and thus, <br />fulfill its statutory obligation to <br />ensure the "greatest utilization of the <br />waters of the state." SB 01 -216: <br />❑ Allows local governments to <br />obtain recreational water rights. <br />❑ Defines "beneficial use" to <br />include in- channel diversions. <br />❑ Provides for review by Water <br />Courts regarding injury to other <br />water rights. <br />❑ Requires the CWCB to make <br />findings regarding the protection of <br />Colorado's interstate compact <br />entitlements; the appropriateness of <br />the stream reach for the intended use; <br />reasonable & appropriate water use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.