My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Bill Would Protect Upstream Water Users from Rec Interests
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Bill Would Protect Upstream Water Users from Rec Interests
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2010 12:10:30 PM
Creation date
6/14/2010 10:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB 01-216
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/19/2001
Author
Tom McAvoy, The Pueblo Chieftain
Title
Bill Would Protect Upstream Water Users from Rec Interests
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Pueblo Chieftain Online - Thursday April 19, 2001 <br />threat of claims on stream flows. <br />The San Luis Valley Republican and potato <br />farmer won Senate Public Policy and <br />Planning Committee approval Wednesday <br />for a bill to require a Water Conservation <br />Board review and recommendations before <br />such recreational diversion applications go to <br />water court. <br />Entz and water experts summed up the <br />urgency: <br />When the city of Fort Collins received <br />rights to 30 cubic feet per second to <br />accommodate a kayak course, it was a <br />worrisome water court precedent. <br />Then, Littleton raised the ante by <br />winning a water court decree for 100 <br />cubic feet per second (each cfs being <br />450 gallons per minute or 636,360 <br />gallons of water per day). <br />Now, Golden has applied for 1,000 cfs, <br />which some experts equated with "the <br />entire flow" of Clear Creek as it passes <br />through the brewery city west of <br />Denver. <br />Attorney General Ken Salazar's "huge <br />concern" is Colorado's river compact <br />entitlements, said First Assistant Attorney <br />General Steve Simms, testifying for Entz's <br />SB216. <br />If large in- channel diversions end up <br />preventing upstream users from exercising <br />their water rights, the water could flow <br />through the designated kayak or boating <br />runs all the way downstream until it actually <br />leaves the state. <br />Patti Wells of the Denver Water Board said <br />large in- channel diversions may become the <br />means for environmentalists to achieve their <br />no- growth ends. <br />"If you can get an instream flow, you can in <br />fact prevent upstream growth," she said. <br />Simms said Golden experiences a flow of <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />http: / /www.chieftain.com /thursday /news /index/article /1 4/19/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.