My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fact Sheet Concerning RICD's
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Fact Sheet Concerning RICD's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 1:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/14/2010 9:36:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD Meetings Notes and Comments
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/1/2001
Author
CWCB
Title
Fact Sheet Concerning RICD's
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Bill Owens, Governor <br />Greg Walcher, DNR Executive Director <br />Rod Kuharich, CWCB Director July 2001 <br />FACT SHEET CONCERNING IN- CHANNEL <br />RECREATIONAL DIVERSIONS <br />Background <br />In 1992 the Colorado Supreme Court held that entities may <br />obtain a water right for a flow within a stream channel if <br />the entity controls the water to serve the intended purpose. <br />The decision allowed Fort Collins to obtain a water right <br />for 30 cfs in the summer and 5 -cfs in the winter for a boat <br />chute located on the Cache La Poudre River. <br />In 1999 another decree was awarded to Littleton for 100 cfs <br />for its kayaking course on the South Platte River. <br />In 2001, the City of Golden obtained a water right decree <br />for up to 1000 cfs in Clear Creek — essentially all the <br />available flow. <br />Because "control" was not statutorily defined and the Fort <br />Collins decision is very broad, entities could have obtained <br />a water right without having done much to the stream. <br />In December 2000, applications were filed by Breckenridge <br />and the Eagle County Water and Sanitation District (Vail), <br />and by the Browns (citizens in water division 4), each <br />claiming a large portion of the available water in the river. <br />Then, in the 2001 legislative session, the Colorado General <br />Assembly acted by passing SB 01 -216, which includes <br />provisions requiring the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board (CWCB) to make findings and adopt rules consistent <br />with the bill. <br />The CWCB is holding public hearings about the rules and <br />will begin the formal rule- making process in fall 2001. <br />Boat chutes exist or are being designed in: <br />Aspen Boulder Denver Durango <br />Fort Collins Golden Grand Junction <br />Gunnison Littleton (South Suburban) <br />Littleton (Union Avenue) Ouray Pueblo <br />Salida Steamboat Springs Vail <br />Summary <br />SB 01 -216, signed into law on June <br />5, 2001, provides: <br />• That only local governments can <br />obtain recreational water rights. <br />• A definition of "beneficial use" <br />to include in- channel diversions. <br />• For the CWCB to make findings <br />regarding the protection of <br />Colorado's interstate compact <br />entitlements; the appropriateness <br />of the stream reach for the <br />intended use; reasonable & <br />appropriate water use and to <br />submit its findings to water court. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.