Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS p_ age <br />I. THORNTON'S REPLY BRIEF <br />A. The February 18, 1986 Date Of Appropriation <br />Awarded By The Water Court For The Nature Center <br />Diversion Dam Is Completely Unsupported By The <br />Evidence. ............... ............................... 2 <br />1. The Land Use Plan and approving resolution <br />do not support a February 18, 1986 date of <br />appropriation ........ ............................... 3 <br />2. The other acts relied upon by the water court <br />do not support a date of appropriation of <br />February 18, 1986 .... ............................... 8 <br />B. The Water Court Erred In Allowing The 1988 <br />Application To Relate Back To The Filing Of The <br />1986 Application . ......... ............................... 11 <br />C. The Water Court Erred In Confirming A Water <br />Right For The Nature Center Diversion Dam Since Fort <br />Collins Failed To Demonstrate That The Water <br />Can And Will Be Beneficially Used. ......... .... . . . . . . . . . .. 13 <br />II. THORNTON'S RESPONSE TO FORT COLLINS' BRIEF <br />ON CROSS - APPEAL. <br />A. The Water Court Concluded That The Power Plant <br />Diversion Dam Fails To Control Water Sufficiently <br />To Constitute An Appropriation Of Water Under C.R.S. <br />§§ 37 -92- 103(7) and 305(9)(b) . .............................. 14 <br />III. CONCLUSION ................ ............................... 17 <br />IV. APPENDICES <br />A. Reproduction of Statutes <br />u s <br />B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Judgment and Decree, Case No. 86CW371, <br />Water Division 1, entered by Judge Connie L. Peterson on November 8, 1990 <br />( "Decree ") <br />