Laserfiche WebLink
2. The water court court had sufficient evidence to support its <br />determination that the Nature Center Diversion Dam diverts <br />water ......... ............................... 20 <br />3. Based on the evidence before the water court and the Findings <br />of Fact, the water court erred in determining that the Power <br />Plant Diversion Dam does not effect a diversion .......... 21 <br />4. Fort Collins demonstrated that it can and will complete the <br />gppropriation of the Nature Center Diversion Dam conditional <br />water right and aunty water diverted by the Dam to beneficial <br />uses, in fulfillment of C.R_S § 37- 92- 305(9)(b) . .......... 24 <br />V. CONCLUSION ............... ............................... 28 <br />APPENDIXES <br />1. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Judgment and Decree, Case No. 86CW371, <br />District Court, Water Division 1, State of Colorado. <br />2. C.R.C.P. 15 and 81. <br />3. C.R.S. §§ 37 -92 -102, 103, and 305. <br />4. Colo. Const. art. XVI, § 6. <br />5. Transcript, Rec. Vol. 3, pp. 24 -41. <br />6. Transcript, Rec. Vol. 3, pp. 234 -235. <br />7. Application, Rec. Vol. 1, pp. 3 -15. <br />8. Amendments to Application, Rec. Vol. 1, pp. 116 -122. <br />FTCOLVLEADINGWIEF.APP ii <br />