Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Page <br />I. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW......... 1 <br />II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE . ............................... 1 <br />A. Nature of the Case, Course of Proceedings and Disposition <br />by the Trial Court ..... ............................... 1 <br />B. Statement of Facts .... ............................... 3 <br />III. ARGUMENT <br />A. Summary of the Argument .............................. 6 <br />B. The Evidence Presented By Fort Collins Does Not Support <br />An Appropriation Date Of February 18, 1986 For A Water <br />Right At The Nature Center Diversion Dam ................. 7 <br />1. The water court erred in holding that Fort Collins' <br />adoption of the Poudre River Trust Land Use Policy <br />Plan and other acts shown by the evidence manifested <br />a fixed intent by Fort Collins to divert 55 c.fs. at <br />the Nature Center Diversion Dam as of the date of <br />adoption of that plan, February 18, 1986 ................ 9 <br />a. Neither the Land Use Plan nor the approving <br />resolution satisfy the requirement of establishing <br />that Fort Collins had formed the intent to appropriate <br />a water right at the Nature Center Diversion Dam as of <br />February 18, 1986 ............................... 9 <br />b. The Smith field trip is not evidence that Fort <br />Collins had formed the intent to appropriate a water <br />right at the Nature Center Diversion Dam as of <br />February 18, 1986 ............................... 12 <br />C. The signs and notices posted and published <br />on December 31, 1986 are not evidence that Fort <br />Collins had formed the intent to appropriate a water <br />right at the Nature Center Diversion Dam as of <br />February 18, 1986 ............................... 15 <br />i <br />