the gazette
<br />COLORADO SPRINGS
<br />WA NY, MgY.18, NO
<br />WATER FROM WASTE
<br />Water��
<br />fore the dryness came and will
<br />still be looming when rain and
<br />snow once again fill city reser-
<br />voirs. But the drought has high-
<br />lighted how precious and finite
<br />fresh water is to a town that has
<br />no natural source, which must use
<br />gravity, pumps, pipes and lots of
<br />money to bring its water from the
<br />high country.
<br />The drought, with the talk of
<br />water restrictions and rate in-
<br />creases, has made it obvious fresh
<br />water is liquid in all senses —
<br />prone to slipping through our fin-
<br />gers and running downhill.
<br />City officials reckon they can
<br />Ian
<br />faces
<br />From Al
<br />will see a fundamental
<br />change in the delivery, quali-
<br />ty and cost of their water.
<br />We will be drinking our
<br />own wastewater. It will be
<br />treated, at a high cost, to
<br />make it safe, but the water
<br />will no longer taste like a
<br />clear mountain stream.
<br />We will be bathing in
<br />water brought up from deep
<br />underground, from aquifers
<br />beneath us that recharge so
<br />slowly many experts consider
<br />them nonrenewable resourc-
<br />es. We will be washing our
<br />clothes with water bought
<br />from agricultural users,
<br />water colored by the econom-
<br />ic and social implications its
<br />transfer will have on farm
<br />and ranch communities.
<br />It's all likely to cost a pret-
<br />ty penny. Experts predict
<br />water will be priced high
<br />enough to hurt, high enough
<br />to change the way we use it
<br />and the kind of landscaping
<br />we lavish it upon.
<br />That future could be a lot
<br />closer than 2040, though, if
<br />the city doesn't win politi-
<br />cians' permission to solve a
<br />conundrum bedeviling the
<br />city. Colorado Springs owns a
<br />lot of water, almost double
<br />what we now use, enough to
<br />keep us from drinking our
<br />neighbors' bathing water for
<br />the next 38 years. But it
<br />doesn't have the plumbing to
<br />deliver it.
<br />The city is able to deliver
<br />82 million gallons of water a
<br />day, l million gallons less
<br />than the average daily de-
<br />mand and far less than the
<br />124 million gallons used each
<br />day in June.
<br />The city has been drawing
<br />down its storage reservoirs to
<br />meet that excess demand, but
<br />the drought has reduced the
<br />water in those reservoirs to
<br />worrisome levels.
<br />To free additional water,
<br />the city needs to build a $730
<br />million plumbing project
<br />and quickly.
<br />The Southern Delivery Sys-
<br />tem would feature an expand-
<br />ed Pueblo Reservoir to store
<br />water from the mountains, a
<br />pipeline to deliver the water
<br />to Colorado Springs, a reser-
<br />voir to store it and a water
<br />plant to treat it.
<br />But the project hinges on
<br />permission to expand Pueblo
<br />Reservoir and store water
<br />there from various sources,
<br />something the city is not al-
<br />lowed to do now.
<br />House Resolution 3881
<br />would give the project the go-
<br />ahead, but it is languishing
<br />in the U.S. House of Represen-
<br />tatives.
<br />cup their hands for 38 more years,
<br />bringing fresh water to the
<br />Springs using water rights and
<br />transmountain diversion systems
<br />established over decades.
<br />But by 2040, they estimate, resi-
<br />dents and businesses will be
<br />using more water than the city
<br />owns. Even if more water rights
<br />in the headwaters could be
<br />bought, most water experts say
<br />the days of large transmountain
<br />diversion projects, with their eco-
<br />nomic, environmental and politi-
<br />cal costs, are over.
<br />Colorado Springs residents
<br />See WATER Al2
<br />Opposition to the plan has
<br />arisen from the city of Pueblo
<br />and some Arkansas Valley
<br />residents. That opposition
<br />has spooked two key Republi-
<br />can can lawmakers, U.S. Rep.
<br />Scott McInnis and U.S. Sen.
<br />Wayne Allard, neither of
<br />whom has been willing to en-
<br />dorse the legislation.
<br />Phil Tollefson, director of
<br />Colorado Springs Utilities
<br />and the man charged with
<br />bringing extra water to the
<br />city, said HR3881 is too cru-
<br />cial to allow it to fail. He said
<br />this week the city expects to
<br />find a way to win the permis-
<br />sion needed to build the
<br />water delivery system.
<br />If it doesn't, he said the
<br />city will have to consider
<br />moving up plans to use treat-
<br />ed wastewater as drinking
<br />water, tap groundwater and
<br />buy agricultural water
<br />rights.'
<br />The city might have to re-
<br />vive its plan to build a dam
<br />north of Buena Vista to cap-
<br />ture water the city owns, a
<br />plan shelved in the 1990s in
<br />the face of political and envi-
<br />ronmental opposition.
<br />Tollefson suspects local
<br />residents have given little
<br />thought to the consequences
<br />— many unpalatable — that
<br />flow from their 15- minute
<br />showers and green lawns..
<br />"My general sense is that
<br />an awful lot of people are plac,
<br />ing blind trust in government
<br />and in agencies like'ours to
<br />do the right things," he said.
<br />"But they don't understand
<br />how terribly difficult and
<br />challenging it is. Everybody
<br />wants everything, and they
<br />want it for free."
<br />Colorado Springs City
<br />Councilman Richard Skor-
<br />man said it's time to have a
<br />community discussion about,
<br />the ways we use water and
<br />how much we pay for it.
<br />"We have a responsibility
<br />here," he said.
<br />"We are lucky to get the
<br />water first, before it's treated
<br />180 times before it reaches
<br />the Gulf of Mexico. I think we
<br />have a responsibility not to
<br />waste it."
<br />Skorman said the vast ex-
<br />panses of Kentucky bluegrass
<br />blanketing the city and the
<br />carpets of sod continuing to
<br />be laid down by developers
<br />are unsustainable in a semi-
<br />arid climate.
<br />He said it might be time to
<br />enact a residential landscape
<br />ordinance that would offer in-
<br />centives for planting vegeta-
<br />tion appropriate for the local
<br />climate. He said it's time to
<br />consider disincentives, in the
<br />form of higher water rates,
<br />perhaps based on the amount
<br />homeowners use, a system in
<br />place for commercial users,
<br />the largest group of water
<br />users.
<br />"We've gotten spoiled. We
<br />don't make the right choices,'.'
<br />he said. "It's a good time dur-
<br />ing a drought to think what it
<br />means to turn our faucets on.
<br />It's a good time to ask the com-
<br />munity whether it wants its
<br />rates increased, whether we
<br />want to drink recycled water,
<br />whether we want to impact
<br />farm communities so we can
<br />have green lawns for six
<br />months of the year.
<br />"We are robbing precious
<br />resources from our children."
<br />Bill McKeown covers general assign-
<br />ments and may be reached at 636-0197
<br />or mckeown @gazette.com
<br />Springs K
<br />opposition
<br />By Bill McKeown
<br />The Gazette
<br />It may be us. It's probably our
<br />children. It will most definitely be
<br />our childrpn's children. Someday,
<br />DRY sooner
<br />or later, residents of Colo -
<br />- - -
<br />rado Springs will be drinking
<br />TIMES their
<br />own wastewater — and pay -
<br />2002
<br />ing dearly for the privilege.
<br />That future, long a reality in
<br />many cities but a sobering pros -
<br />More coverage on
<br />pect for a town that has enjoyed a
<br />'the drought and
<br />century of sweet water direct
<br />those who fight
<br />from the mountains, is not the re-
<br />sult of the three -year drought
<br />wildfires.
<br />parching Colorado.
<br />A13, Metro 1
<br />That future was ordained be-
<br />Water��
<br />fore the dryness came and will
<br />still be looming when rain and
<br />snow once again fill city reser-
<br />voirs. But the drought has high-
<br />lighted how precious and finite
<br />fresh water is to a town that has
<br />no natural source, which must use
<br />gravity, pumps, pipes and lots of
<br />money to bring its water from the
<br />high country.
<br />The drought, with the talk of
<br />water restrictions and rate in-
<br />creases, has made it obvious fresh
<br />water is liquid in all senses —
<br />prone to slipping through our fin-
<br />gers and running downhill.
<br />City officials reckon they can
<br />Ian
<br />faces
<br />From Al
<br />will see a fundamental
<br />change in the delivery, quali-
<br />ty and cost of their water.
<br />We will be drinking our
<br />own wastewater. It will be
<br />treated, at a high cost, to
<br />make it safe, but the water
<br />will no longer taste like a
<br />clear mountain stream.
<br />We will be bathing in
<br />water brought up from deep
<br />underground, from aquifers
<br />beneath us that recharge so
<br />slowly many experts consider
<br />them nonrenewable resourc-
<br />es. We will be washing our
<br />clothes with water bought
<br />from agricultural users,
<br />water colored by the econom-
<br />ic and social implications its
<br />transfer will have on farm
<br />and ranch communities.
<br />It's all likely to cost a pret-
<br />ty penny. Experts predict
<br />water will be priced high
<br />enough to hurt, high enough
<br />to change the way we use it
<br />and the kind of landscaping
<br />we lavish it upon.
<br />That future could be a lot
<br />closer than 2040, though, if
<br />the city doesn't win politi-
<br />cians' permission to solve a
<br />conundrum bedeviling the
<br />city. Colorado Springs owns a
<br />lot of water, almost double
<br />what we now use, enough to
<br />keep us from drinking our
<br />neighbors' bathing water for
<br />the next 38 years. But it
<br />doesn't have the plumbing to
<br />deliver it.
<br />The city is able to deliver
<br />82 million gallons of water a
<br />day, l million gallons less
<br />than the average daily de-
<br />mand and far less than the
<br />124 million gallons used each
<br />day in June.
<br />The city has been drawing
<br />down its storage reservoirs to
<br />meet that excess demand, but
<br />the drought has reduced the
<br />water in those reservoirs to
<br />worrisome levels.
<br />To free additional water,
<br />the city needs to build a $730
<br />million plumbing project
<br />and quickly.
<br />The Southern Delivery Sys-
<br />tem would feature an expand-
<br />ed Pueblo Reservoir to store
<br />water from the mountains, a
<br />pipeline to deliver the water
<br />to Colorado Springs, a reser-
<br />voir to store it and a water
<br />plant to treat it.
<br />But the project hinges on
<br />permission to expand Pueblo
<br />Reservoir and store water
<br />there from various sources,
<br />something the city is not al-
<br />lowed to do now.
<br />House Resolution 3881
<br />would give the project the go-
<br />ahead, but it is languishing
<br />in the U.S. House of Represen-
<br />tatives.
<br />cup their hands for 38 more years,
<br />bringing fresh water to the
<br />Springs using water rights and
<br />transmountain diversion systems
<br />established over decades.
<br />But by 2040, they estimate, resi-
<br />dents and businesses will be
<br />using more water than the city
<br />owns. Even if more water rights
<br />in the headwaters could be
<br />bought, most water experts say
<br />the days of large transmountain
<br />diversion projects, with their eco-
<br />nomic, environmental and politi-
<br />cal costs, are over.
<br />Colorado Springs residents
<br />See WATER Al2
<br />Opposition to the plan has
<br />arisen from the city of Pueblo
<br />and some Arkansas Valley
<br />residents. That opposition
<br />has spooked two key Republi-
<br />can can lawmakers, U.S. Rep.
<br />Scott McInnis and U.S. Sen.
<br />Wayne Allard, neither of
<br />whom has been willing to en-
<br />dorse the legislation.
<br />Phil Tollefson, director of
<br />Colorado Springs Utilities
<br />and the man charged with
<br />bringing extra water to the
<br />city, said HR3881 is too cru-
<br />cial to allow it to fail. He said
<br />this week the city expects to
<br />find a way to win the permis-
<br />sion needed to build the
<br />water delivery system.
<br />If it doesn't, he said the
<br />city will have to consider
<br />moving up plans to use treat-
<br />ed wastewater as drinking
<br />water, tap groundwater and
<br />buy agricultural water
<br />rights.'
<br />The city might have to re-
<br />vive its plan to build a dam
<br />north of Buena Vista to cap-
<br />ture water the city owns, a
<br />plan shelved in the 1990s in
<br />the face of political and envi-
<br />ronmental opposition.
<br />Tollefson suspects local
<br />residents have given little
<br />thought to the consequences
<br />— many unpalatable — that
<br />flow from their 15- minute
<br />showers and green lawns..
<br />"My general sense is that
<br />an awful lot of people are plac,
<br />ing blind trust in government
<br />and in agencies like'ours to
<br />do the right things," he said.
<br />"But they don't understand
<br />how terribly difficult and
<br />challenging it is. Everybody
<br />wants everything, and they
<br />want it for free."
<br />Colorado Springs City
<br />Councilman Richard Skor-
<br />man said it's time to have a
<br />community discussion about,
<br />the ways we use water and
<br />how much we pay for it.
<br />"We have a responsibility
<br />here," he said.
<br />"We are lucky to get the
<br />water first, before it's treated
<br />180 times before it reaches
<br />the Gulf of Mexico. I think we
<br />have a responsibility not to
<br />waste it."
<br />Skorman said the vast ex-
<br />panses of Kentucky bluegrass
<br />blanketing the city and the
<br />carpets of sod continuing to
<br />be laid down by developers
<br />are unsustainable in a semi-
<br />arid climate.
<br />He said it might be time to
<br />enact a residential landscape
<br />ordinance that would offer in-
<br />centives for planting vegeta-
<br />tion appropriate for the local
<br />climate. He said it's time to
<br />consider disincentives, in the
<br />form of higher water rates,
<br />perhaps based on the amount
<br />homeowners use, a system in
<br />place for commercial users,
<br />the largest group of water
<br />users.
<br />"We've gotten spoiled. We
<br />don't make the right choices,'.'
<br />he said. "It's a good time dur-
<br />ing a drought to think what it
<br />means to turn our faucets on.
<br />It's a good time to ask the com-
<br />munity whether it wants its
<br />rates increased, whether we
<br />want to drink recycled water,
<br />whether we want to impact
<br />farm communities so we can
<br />have green lawns for six
<br />months of the year.
<br />"We are robbing precious
<br />resources from our children."
<br />Bill McKeown covers general assign-
<br />ments and may be reached at 636-0197
<br />or mckeown @gazette.com
<br />Springs K
<br />opposition
<br />
|