Laserfiche WebLink
8 Will opine as to the lowest amount of flow on the Clear Creek Whitew <br />as designed, that the types of whitewater features typically desired on "world clan course, <br />whitewater courses can be achieved. s" <br />Will opine as to reasonableness or unreasonableness of designing the Clear Cr <br />Whitewater course for a flow of 1000 c.f.s in May, June and July. eek <br />Knox and Stenzel. <br />Assistant State Engineer Knox and Division Engineer Stenzel are prepared to t <br />about the same subject material, only Mr. Knox will be called to testi , howev event that the business of the State Engineer's Office prevents Mr. Knox from attend' <br />trial, Mr. Stenzel will t <br />�' ver in th <br />fy. The following summarizes both men's opinions. attending <br />Prop Water ht App Hydrology <br />1 To accurately administer the claimed .recreational instream flow right it i <br />necessary to measure the stream on a three -week schedule during the wiper. months <br />(November through March) and every two weeks for the remainder <br />changing streambed/control conditions.., of the year to reflect <br />2• Applicant has failed to provide evidence or suggested adequate terms and <br />conditions that would provide sufficient stream flow measurement frequency that <br />required for accurate and timely administration in this highly over-appropriated is <br />system. <br />�• It is unreasonable for Applicant to claim water rights for the recreationa 1 in <br />flow that is predicated upon the instantaneous peak flow the Clear that was measured at lean <br />Creek at Golden, Colorado stream flow gaging station for each month in 1998 <br />and for <br />June and July of 1999. - An average daily flow is a more appropriate measurement. <br />4• The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support their clai <br />available at times during the day or frequency to <br />apply water to beneficial use wS are <br />unreasonable command of the Clear Creek system. ithout <br />5 The amounts available for appropriation to the City of Golden in this a <br />must be limited to the amount necessa pplication <br />beneficial use without waste. The proposed decreeseeks mounts i n the intended <br />excess of amounts necessary and sufficient to accomplish the <br />waste. intended beneficial use without <br />Potential Im Dact by Upstream A ropriators that are Junior to the Golden's <br />C - -ourSe <br />White Water <br />