Laserfiche WebLink
8 UPDATING THE HOOVER DAM DOCUMENTS <br />of dropping the competitive rate base for a rate fixed by the amount needed to amortize the investment <br />allocated to power, plus costs of operation, maintenance and replacemen t <br />d pe riodical ly b competitive conditions a rate <br />The Adjustment Act substituted for the old rate adjuste31, 1987y sufficie to meet: operation, <br />stabilized for the 50 - year' period from Jun er t to 1 <br />he T eas of reimbursable advances, including interest <br />maintenance, and replacement costs; repay <br />which was reduced from 4 percent to 3 pe cess reve $ paid i ded a for hose ° States by Section 4(b) of the Proj- <br />Nevada in commutation of the share of ex <br />ect Act; and payment of $500,000 annually to the Colorado Ri SecDe <br />n 2(b) of the Project Act was deferred <br />Repayment of the $25,000,000 allocated to flood contr ol after which time repayment shall be <br />until June 1, 1987, without interest, after the 50 -year repay <br />as determined by Congress. <br />Among other features of the Act was a provision (Sectio t States or f o r <br />political subdiv. sionseThis <br />to pro was <br />Nevada if the project or features of it were taxed by the ates <br />utilized in 1970 when Clark County, Nevada, attempted P roj e ct. ( to tax the interests of the City of Los <br />Angeles and The Metropolitan Water District in th e P o erating agreement for the <br />Another provision (Section 9) authorized the Secretary to substitute an agency The agency contract <br />lease held by the City of Los Angeles and antra °ï¿½ w e e terednto on p ublic au <br />Califor <br />same date (the Arizona contract <br />was executed May 29, 1941. Nine energy <br />was executed November 23, 1945) . These <br />wer w <br />nd t <br />The tMetropolitan Water Distr ct; and thesetilities• <br />of Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Los Angeles endix 1 C.6 for text <br />Southern California Edison Company and California Electric Power Company (see App <br />of Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act) . <br />C. 7 Water Delivery Contracts General <br />}, s Section 5 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act. It <br />P The basis of the Secretary s contracting authority i _ <br />authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to contract <br />and d e ° The A f provides that such on tracts <br />and for the delivery thereof for irrigation <br />be for "permanent service." And, of particular importance; the Act provides: <br />pur of the water stored as aforesaid ex <br />"No person shall have or be entitled to have the use for any <br />cept by contract made as herein stated." <br />E <br />C.7.1 Implementation of Water Delivery Contract Authority eergy for <br />purchaser of over Since The Metropolitan Water District was assu n labs proposed Colorado RivepAquDeduct na power <br />the purpose of pumping water to southern Califo <br />very contract between the Secrtary a <br />contract for that purpose required a w ater ttd ct for repayment of construe on the All Ameeri a Canal, a <br />f mit Imperial Irrigation District (IID) to con <br />ed. Hence the need arose for negotiation of water delivery con - <br />water delivery contract with III) was need <br />tracts by the Secretary. <br />D. California Seven Party Agreement <br />t Act with <br />i t <br />ontracts under the Boulder Before the Secretary entered into warter delivery ci C oes of rights among the <br />c "California A reement" of August <br />users in California, he requested the State to agree on a tie Se en Party g <br />major users of Colorado River waters. This <br />r waYd one by <br />18, 1931, which contained the following p °' <br />