Laserfiche WebLink
specifically preserve the Board's authority to argue these issues in water court. Section 37-92 - <br />102(6)(b), C.R.S. (2001) requires the Board to make the following findings: <br />a. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICD would impair the ability of <br />Colorado to fully develop and place to consumptive Beneficial Use its Compact <br />Entitlements. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />i. The amount and location of remaining unappropriated Compact Entitlement <br />waters in the basin in question and at the RICD point of diversion; <br />ii. The proximity of the RICD to the state line; <br />iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage <br />which may be utilized by those who would place the water to consumptive <br />beneficial use; <br />iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for <br />consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; and, <br />V. Exchange opportunities within the state that may be adversely impacted by the <br />existence of the RICD. <br />b. Whether the RICD appropriation is for an appropriate reach of stream for the intended <br />use. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />i. The nature of the recreational activity for which the RICD is sought; <br />ii. The length of and efficiency of the diversion of the proposed reach required for <br />the intended use; <br />iii. Whether the RICD can be adequately measured and administered through the <br />proposed reach; and, <br />iv. Whether the RICD will affect flooding, flood control, or the one - hundred year <br />flood elevations. <br />c. Whether there is access for recreational in- channel use. The Board, in making this <br />finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: <br />i. The nature and extent of the access required for the activity for which a RICD is <br />being sought; <br />ii. The ownership, leasehold, or other legal interest held by or available to the <br />Applicant for purposes of obtaining access; and, <br />iii. Any impediments to the Applicant obtaining access determined necessary for the <br />intended use. <br />d. Whether the exercise of the RICD would cause material injury to existing ISF water <br />rights. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />i. The nature and extent of the ISF in the proposed reach or any affected <br />downstream reach; <br />ii. The timing and duration of the RICD as such may relate to the specific use which <br />is the basis for the ISF; <br />iii. Whether the RICD would negatively impact the natural environment for which <br />the ISF was decreed; and, <br />iv. Whether during the construction of the RICD structures, the construction may <br />cause material injury to the ISF or the natural environment that the ISF protects. <br />