My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Item 9, Platte River Recovery Updates and House Bill 07-1182
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Agenda Item 9, Platte River Recovery Updates and House Bill 07-1182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:00 AM
Creation date
6/7/2010 4:49:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
South Platte Endangered Species
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/11/2007
Author
Randy Seaholm, Ted Kowalski
Title
Agenda Item 9, Platte River Recovery Updates and House Bill 07-1182
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
with the issue of post -May 1 call protection in Congress, which has the ultimate authority <br /> for United States property and to bind the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> • <br /> 4. Congress is also the appropriate body to consider the equities involved in the impact of <br /> the PMP. As we have previously noted, (1) the FEIS shows no correlation between water <br /> uses in the Upper North Platte River Basin and water shortages in the Nebraska recovery <br /> area, and (2) the Supreme Court and the Special Master in the Nebraska v. Wyoming <br /> lawsuit recognized that there is little or no hydrologic connection between water use <br /> above Pathfinder Reservoir in Wyoming and water shortage in the Nebraska recovery <br /> area. Yet, the Upper Basin water users are asked to bear the brunt of the PMP impacts. <br /> This inequity may not be given the weight it deserves by the Board of Control. It is up to <br /> Congress. <br /> 5. The shortcomings of the FEIS are also properly before Congress as the Board of Control <br /> cannot remedy its deficiencies. As we have noted, Appendix F of the final Modified <br /> Decree mandates that the Bureau of Reclamation cannot proceed with the PMP until it <br /> has been appropriately considered under the National Environmental Policy Act. As the <br /> impacts of a post -May 1 call were not even considered in the FEIS, such a call cannot be <br /> part of the approved PRRIP program. <br /> 6. The North Platte River is already overappropriated. There is simply no additional water <br /> available for storage in Pathfinder Reservoir, and no new water will be created by way of <br /> the PMP. In addition, the environmental and municipal accounts contemplated for the <br /> PMP will store water on an equal priority basis with all other users of the Reservoir. This • <br /> becomes an additional demand for the full, unrestricted 1.016 million acre -feet of existing <br /> storage capacity in the Reservoir. Irrigators in the Upper North Platte River basin are <br /> asked to give up their water rights for both the PRRIP and municipalities. <br /> Congress, and specifically the Water and Power and Power Subcommittee, is the appropriate <br /> forum to provide the relief necessary for the water users in the Upper North Platte River Basin. <br /> Amending Senate Bill 752 now with the language proposed in our previous comments will <br /> achieve that very end and lessen the chance for future disputes on the PMP implementation. <br /> We thank you again for the opportunity to comment on Senate Bill 752, for your questions on the <br /> appropriate mechanism to provide post -May 1 call protection, and for your interest in the Upper <br /> North Platte River Basin. <br /> 15308 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.