My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Riparian Resources for Aspinall PDEIS
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Riparian Resources for Aspinall PDEIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:30 AM
Creation date
6/7/2010 3:48:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Aspinall DEIS
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
9/3/2008
Author
National Park Service
Title
Riparian Resources for Aspinall PDEIS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
woody vegetation on 55 to 65 percent of the bottomland. The preimpoundment period used <br /> in this analysis was typified by drier periods and scour during that 31 year interval <br /> prevented woody vegetation from colonizing 40 percent of the bottomland. <br /> The 31 year preimpoundment condition did not have an interval exceeding 3 years without a <br /> flow that removed woody vegetation from at least 50 percent of the bottomland. <br /> The No- Action alternative has an 8 year interval, a 9 year interval and a 10 year interval <br /> without a flow that removed woody vegetation on 50 percent of the bottomland. Impacts of <br /> operations governed by the No- Action will be long -term duration. <br /> Action - alternatives A through b are each characterized with an 8 year interval, a 9 year <br /> interval and a 10 year interval without a flow that removed woody vegetation on 50 percent <br /> of the bottomland. Impacts of operations governed by the action - alternatives will be long- <br /> term in duration. <br /> INTENSITY: The No- Action reduces the percentage of bottomland cleared by shear by 63 <br /> percent and is of major intensity. <br /> Each action - alternative is increase the percentage of bottomland cleared by shear with <br /> respect to the No- Action. Operation governed by action - alternatives A through b each will <br /> have a moderate increase on woody vegetation removal by scour. <br /> TYPE: Operations under the No- Action and each of the action- alternatives is adverse with <br /> respect to protection of bottomland riparian resources. <br /> CONCLUSION: Conclusions are summarized in Table 2. Operation governed by the No- <br /> Action alternative can be expected to have a regional scale, long -term and major intensity <br /> impact to Black Canyon riverine resources. Continuation of operation by the No- Action <br /> would result in irreversible encroachment of woody vegetation and an overall adverse impact <br /> to Park resources. <br /> Operations governed by the action - alternative A can be expected to have or action - <br /> alternative A can be expected to have a local -scale improvement on the regional -scale <br /> impact of the current operation. The long- duration of the operation and moderate intensity <br /> improvement is still expected to result in irreversible encroachment of woody vegetation <br /> and the type of the impact is adverse. <br /> Operations governed by action - alternatives B or C can be expected to local -scale <br /> improvement on the regional -scale impact of the current operation. Operation under action- <br /> alternatives will have a long -term impact on park resources; the duration of successive <br /> intervals without a shearing flow is too long. The intensity is moderate. Moderate intensity <br /> improvement coupled with the long-term duration is not sufficient to preclude the <br /> encroachment of woody vegetation and the type of response is adverse. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.