Laserfiche WebLink
During the early 1930s, Pueblo and the Arkansas Valley experienced a severe <br /> drought, which created near dustbowl conditions. This continued for many years, <br /> preventing otherwise fertile soil from being productive throughout the normal growing <br /> season. In the mid- 1950s, President Dwight D. Eisenhower visited Pueblo and the <br /> Arkansas Valley. He took this opportunity to experience firsthand the blighted <br /> conditions of the soil and the plight of the region's farming communities. In good, wet <br /> years, nature stored heavy - packed snow in the high Rocky Mountains. Farmers had <br /> water for the initial part of the growing season, but not all of the growing season, as <br /> run -off in the early part of the season prevented water from being available later in the <br /> year. This flow regime made it difficult for the farming community to harvest good <br /> crops and utilize the fertile soil to its full potential. After many years of local citizens <br /> selling cast iron frying pans to generate funds for lobbying Congress, President John F. <br /> Kennedy- visited Pueblo and -signed 1. egi -s-l- ate -o - -aut ri i—r the-- Bur-eau_of e-cl-aration to <br /> begin building the Fryingpan- Arkansas Project, part of which is Pueblo Reservoir <br /> located less than 10 miles upstream from Pueblo. This project brings surplus water <br /> from the western slope of Colorado to southeastern Colorado for use by the people of <br /> southeastern Colorado. Once completed in 1975, Pueblo Reservoir provided relief to <br /> the farm communities downstream as a more reliable source of precious water fotboth <br /> agriculture and domestic use. <br /> Now, nearly thirty years later, there are those that see the project's usefulness <br /> not in terms of preserving the River and the life which it brings to southeastern <br /> Colorado, but as a vehicle to transfer and store additional water for use elsewhere. <br /> Both the economic difficulties of farming and the value of water to thirsty metropolitan <br /> cities - such as Aurora which lies more than 100 miles north of Pueblo - are exerting <br /> pressure to remold the project into a vehicle to transfer more water away from Pueblo <br /> and the region generally, by making possible additional upstream exchanges of water, <br /> that previously flowed through the City to downstream users. As explained below by <br /> Ms. Castle in her testimony, H.R. 3881 as presently drafted, will allow further <br /> exchanges and transfers, and conceivably could at times dry up the Arkansas River <br /> through Pueblo. <br /> As presently written, Pueblo must oppose H.R. 3881. First, we do this because <br /> the bill authorizes reoperation of the project and contemplates enlargement of water <br /> storage space in a manner that will benefit other entities far from the Arkansas River <br /> while burdening Pueblo. These burdens are the additional depletion of the Arkansas <br /> River as it flows through Pueblo, thereby diminishing the value of the River as an <br /> important and irreplaceable amenity for the City and its residents. Second, the project <br /> may thwart the City's efforts to restore the riparian habitat and enhance recreation <br /> through Pueblo under the Arkansas River Corridor Legacy Project (the "Legacy <br /> Project ") being undertaken by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in <br /> partnership with Pueblo: The Legacy Project, which involves improvements to <br /> approximately ten miles of the River as it runs through the core of the City, has been <br /> long in planning, and enjoys the support and cooperation of numerous entities, <br /> including the Pueblo Natural Resources and Environmental Education Council, funding <br /> from Great Outdoors Colorado and the provision of lands and easements from the <br /> Pueblo Conservancy District. Third, the River may be depleted to such a degree that <br /> 3 <br />