My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hearing on HR 3881: Testimony of Steve Arveschoug
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Hearing on HR 3881: Testimony of Steve Arveschoug
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:21 AM
Creation date
6/3/2010 2:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Briefing Papers H.R. 3881
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
3/19/2002
Author
Steve Arveschoug
Title
Hearing on HR 3881: Testimony of Steve Arveschoug
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Local Commitment to the PSOP and H.R. 3881 - -At the present time, the <br /> District has secured the participation of twenty (20) communities and water <br /> providers within the District, representing the 680,000 constituents of the District, <br /> for the implementation of the PSOP. These entities have signed agreements with <br /> the District requesting 38,300 acre -feet of re- operations contract storage and <br /> 69,775 acre -feet of enlargement storage. H.R. 3881 represents the first step in <br /> meeting these expectations. In order to meet their growing demands these <br /> communities need the ability to contract with Reclamation for the use of excess <br /> capacity by the year 2003. And, they need an enlargement of Pueblo Reservoir <br /> by the year 2013, and the enlargement of Turquoise Reservoir by the year 2025. <br /> This is definitely a long -range plan to provide for the future water needs of rural <br /> and urban communities within the Southeastern District. <br /> Building Consensus for the PSOP and Addressing the Issues -- Throughout <br /> the development of the PSOP and this federal legislation we have identified <br /> issues of concern that must be addressed as the PSOP is implemented. Many of <br /> those issues relate to recreation at the Fry-Ark Project's reservoirs or on the <br /> Arkansas River above and below the reservoirs. Pueblo Reservoir, the Fry -Ark <br /> Project's main storage facility (350,000 acre -feet covering 6,000 surface acres), <br /> averages over one million visitors each year to the Colorado State Park <br /> campgrounds and boating facilities. Most years Pueblo Reservoir is the most - <br /> visited state park in Colorado. In addition, the Fry-Ark Project is used to help <br /> manage flows in the upper Arkansas River to support fishing and rafting <br /> opportunities in the communities of Buena Vista and Salida, Colorado. This flow <br /> management effort is called the Upper Arkansas Flow Management Program, <br /> and for over ten years it has been a cooperative effort of the Colorado <br /> Department of Natural Resources, including State Parks and the Division of <br /> Wildlife, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Arkansas River Outfitters Association, <br /> local communities in the upper Arkansas, the Southeastern District, and water - <br /> right owners from throughout the basin. <br /> Under Reclamation's leadership the Fry-Ark Project has made a tangible <br /> commitment to the fish and wildlife and recreation interests within the Arkansas <br /> River basin. And, that commitment will continue and be enhanced under the <br /> District's preferred Storage Options Plan. <br /> In working with the county commissioners in Lake County we identified the need <br /> to consider land -use and recreation issues associated with the Project's <br /> Turquoise Reservoir and Twin Lakes Reservoir. At the present time we are <br /> drafting an agreement and scope of work with Lake County to cooperatively <br /> study alternatives to enhance recreation opportunities in and around the Fry-Ark <br /> Project reservoirs that are in their county. hopeful We are also ho eful that the feasibility <br /> study of the enlargement of Turquoise that's being asked for in H.R. 3881 will <br /> address the county's questions regarding the potential impacts to recreation at <br /> Turquoise Reservoir when the reservoir is enlarged (not planned for until the year <br /> 2025). <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.