My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fitz-Gerald Amendment - Opposition
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Fitz-Gerald Amendment - Opposition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:18 AM
Creation date
6/3/2010 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB01-216
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Fitz-Gerald Amendment - Opposition
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Fitz - Gerald Amendment - opposition <br /> • Vail & Breckenridge have filed on nearly all the water <br /> in both the Blue River & Gore Creek. <br /> • The Water Court has not set these filings for any <br /> action. <br /> • Golden took over a year just to reach trial. These two <br /> towns will take at least as long. Why give these <br /> applications special treatment? <br /> • Grandfathering these two towns would place a <br /> financial burden on the State. This bill would provide <br /> the opportunity to work out the differences prior to <br /> litigation. <br /> • No water rights could be developed upstream of these <br /> filings, essentially creating a gatekeeper controlling <br /> development of any future water. <br /> • Neither town is at risk of loosing its priority date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.