My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SB 01-216 Concerning In-Channel Recreational Diversions
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
SB 01-216 Concerning In-Channel Recreational Diversions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:31 AM
Creation date
6/2/2010 12:18:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB01-216
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/1/2001
Author
Bill Owens, Greg Walcher, Rod Kuharich
Title
SB 01-216 Concerning In-Channel Recreational Diversions
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a i <br /> COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> Bill Owens, Governor <br /> Greg Walcher, DNR Executive Director <br /> Rod Kuharich, CWCB Director April 2001 <br /> SB 01 -216 CONCERNING IN- CHANNEL <br /> RECREATIONAL DIVERSIONS <br /> Background <br /> In 1992 the Colorado Supreme Court held that entities <br /> may obtain a water right for a flow within a stream <br /> channel if the entity controls the water to serve the ►' • <br /> intended purpose. <br /> - <br /> The decision allowed Fort Collins to obtain a water right <br /> for 30 cfs in the summer and 5 -cfs in the winter for a boat <br /> chute located on the Cache La Poudre River. Bill Summary <br /> In 1999 another modest decree was awarded to the City Municipalities are filing for water <br /> of Littleton for 100 cfs for its kayaking course on the rights for recreational boating. <br /> South Platte River. Individuals and the federal <br /> government may also file for such <br /> In 1998, the City of Golden applied for an appropriation rights. The CWCB recognizes the <br /> of up to 1000 cfs for flows in Clear Creek — essentially benefits to communities of having <br /> all the available flow in Clear Creek. recreational facilities and can play an <br /> important role in reviewing water <br /> Because "control" is not statutorily defined and the Fort rights applications prior to <br /> Collins decision is very broad, entities can now claim submission to water court and thus, <br /> control without having done much to the stream. fulfill its statutory obligation to <br /> ensure the "greatest utilization of the <br /> In December 2000, four similar applications were filed waters of the state." SB 01 -216: <br /> by Aspen, Breckenridge, the Eagle County Water and ❑ Allows local governments to <br /> Sanitation District (Vail), and by the Browns (citizens in obtain recreational water rights. <br /> water division 4). <br /> ❑ Defines "beneficial use" to <br /> Boat chutes exist or are being designed in: include in- channel diversions. <br /> Boulder Denver ❑ Provides for review by Water <br /> Durango Fort Collins Courts regarding injury to other <br /> Golden Grand Junction water rights. <br /> Gunnison Littleton (South Suburban) <br /> Littleton (Union Avenue) Ouray ❑ Requires the CWCB to make <br /> Pueblo Salida findings regarding the protection of <br /> Colorado's interstate compact <br /> Steamboat Springs Vail entitlements; the appropriateness of <br /> the stream reach for the intended use; <br /> reasonable & appropriate water use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.