Laserfiche WebLink
Bush administration opposes Fry-Ark bill http:// www.chieftain.com/print/archive /2002 /mar /20 /nil.htm <br /> S <br /> committee members that disputes between Colorado and Kansas over water rights to the Arkansas River <br /> have been ongoing for the past 100 years. <br /> If the legislation becomes law, it will "cause deep concern to Kansas and potentially cause additional <br /> litigation in the event passage results in increased violations of the Arkansas River Compact - a result all <br /> too likely in Kansas' view," she said. <br /> Moreover, any feasibility study for expanding the Pueblo reservoir would be meaningless, because there <br /> is not enough water as it is, she said. <br /> "We believe we are already 11,000 cubic feet per second short every year," Stovall said. <br /> HR 3881 is sponsored by Rep. Joel Hefley, R- Colorado Springs, and calls for a study of expanding <br /> Pueblo Reservoir, as well as reauthorizing the Fry-Ark project. <br /> It is based on plans that have been on the drawing board of the Southeastern Colorado Water <br /> Conservancy District for more than 3 years as a way to serve population growth in the region - projected <br /> to hit 1.2 million by 2040. <br /> "We need to look for new ways to provide for our water needs," Hefley said at the hearing. "We need the <br /> water in Colorado and this plan will allow us to do it in an intelligent and environmentally sensitive <br /> way <br /> The proposal, known as the Preferred Storage Options Plan, calls for boosting water storage capacity by <br /> up to 75,000 acre -feet by the year 2025. <br /> Steve Arveschoug, general manager of the Southeastern district, defended the proposal as drafted, saying <br /> that he represents 20 local cornrnunities in support of the plan - the same communities that originally <br /> supported the Fry -Ark project when it was first approved by Congress in 1962. <br /> "Our current population is about 640,000 people and projected to be about 1.5 million in 2040," he said <br /> of the nine counties served by the district. "We need to accommodate that growth. We're trying to do the <br /> same thing our forefathers did." <br /> As proposed, expansion of the Fry-Ark project would be pursued in two phases: the first would provide <br /> 50,000 acre -feet by 2010 after making use of existing reservoirs with federal approval. The second phase <br /> would expand Lake Pueblo by up to 75,000 acre -feet by the year 2013 and Turquoise Reservoir by up to <br /> 19,000 acre -feet in the year 2025. <br /> Local funding would pay for the expansion plans, but federal feasibility studies are necessary for the <br /> proposed - enlargements. <br /> While Pueblo's City Council supports the expansion plan in concept, the city wants a guarantee that <br /> there will be an adequate flow of water through the city once the lake is expanded, according to Castle. <br /> Arveschoug said the district is interested in providing a guaranteed flow, but the two sides have not been <br /> able to reach an agreement. The city has filed for water rights to a minimum flow of 500 cubic feet per <br /> second between March and November and 100 cfs during the winter months. <br /> That claim has drawn opposition from Aurora, Colorado Springs and other groups that fear the city's <br /> water rights might interfere with their ability to conduct water exchanges out of Lake Pueblo in the <br /> future. <br /> Castle told the committee that an inadequate river flow would jeopardize the plans for a $6.5 million <br /> Arkansas River Corridor Legacy Project. Once complete, it will include a nature center, new hiking <br /> trails and a boat course that would in part serve the city's low - income residents. <br /> 2 of 3 3/20/02 10:09 AM <br />