Laserfiche WebLink
Tl1e Pueblo Chieftain Online - Wednesday May 8th, 2002 Page 3 of 4 <br /> the valley, we could live with that. But we <br /> would have to get language that there could <br /> be no further transfers out of the basin, and <br /> the Bureau of Reclamation would have to be <br /> restricted in the legislation if it's to be <br /> effective." <br /> Evett agreed that the city should require <br /> language banning further transfers out of the <br /> Arkansas basin. There is a provision <br /> requiring a conservation district's approval of <br /> transfers out of the basin, but critics think <br /> there should be an outright ban. <br /> "We look at it as the (conservancy) district <br /> doing a power grab, but the district says they <br /> want to protect us from the bureau," Evett <br /> said. "I think we need some specific <br /> language that neither the district nor the <br /> bureau has the power to transfer water out of <br /> the basin. <br /> "This legislation may be the last, best hope <br /> for the future of the Arkansas Valley," he <br /> said. <br /> "Utilities people tend to think of so many <br /> cubic feet of water and how do we supply <br /> drinking water to our customers, and that's it. <br /> I should know: I used to be a utilities <br /> manager. But we need to take a broader <br /> view." <br /> As a regional center for shopping, health <br /> care and recreation for Southeastern <br /> Colorado, Pueblo's economy depends on the <br /> river not only through the city but also in <br /> downstream communities, Evett said. <br /> "The regulation of the river, the quality of <br /> water downstream, and the future of the <br /> downstream communities - these are core <br /> issues that really go to the heart of this whole <br /> region." <br /> Back to top <br /> E -mail this story to a friend <br /> ,0„Print this story <br /> http : / /www.chieftain.comlwednesday /news /index/article /1 5/8/02 <br />