Laserfiche WebLink
The broader view Page 1 of 1 <br /> The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> Select file then print to print this article. <br /> Publish Date: May 12, 2002 <br /> The broader view <br /> EDITORIAL <br /> The Pueblo Chieftain <br /> THE ARKANSAS Valley's future is on the line. <br /> As Pueblo City Manager Lee Evett has correctly noted, current legislation in Congress will shape the Arkansas Valley for the next 100 <br /> years. <br /> He refers to House Resolution 3881, the bill authorizing a study of increasing two reservoirs associated with the Fryingpan- Arkansas <br /> Project, but also dealing with how storage space is used. Most of the additional storage space would be utilised by Colorado Springs and <br /> other Fountain Valley users, but it also would give space to Pueblo West. Pueblo West was formed after the creation of Fry Ark by <br /> legislation signed by President John F. Kennedy. <br /> Another part of the legislation would allow long -term storage contracts with Aurora, a city not even in the Arkansas Basin, let alone not <br /> within the boundaries of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District. The district has filed legal opposition annually against <br /> year-to-year storage contracts between Aurora and the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> But now the district has negotiated language for HR 3881 that would codify Aurora's right to storage space even though taxpayers in that <br /> huge Denver suburb are not paying the federal government back for building the Fry Ark Taxpayers in the Southeast District are paying <br /> that tab tbrou • h their property taxes, though. <br /> A majority of directors of the Southeast District have sold the citizens of this valley down the river by agreeing to Aurora's sweetheart deal <br /> on the mistaken fear that U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, whose district includes Aurora, would deep -six the enlargement of Pueblo Dam. <br /> However, Rep. Tancredo is no longer on the subcommittee that handles this legislation, and he says he has never indicated he would try to <br /> interfere with the enlargement <br /> We understand he has to represent the interests of his constituents, but we also believe he has the integrity not to harm the Arkansas Valley. <br /> While we believe Aurora's impending purchase of more water from the Rocky Ford Ditch is a bad deal for this valley, dependent on the <br /> Division 2 water court's approval, we could live with that if HR 3881 were to ban all further diversions out of this valley utilizing Fry-Ark <br /> facilities. Aurora has, through an intergovernmental agreement, pledged not to buy any more water from this basET, and the federal <br /> legislation reflects that agreement. <br /> But the legislation also would allow a future Southeastern District board to approve other purchases and diversions via Fry-Ark That's <br /> simply unacceptable, a point that Mr. Evett also makes. <br /> Pueblo is the regional retail hub for the communities in Southeast Colorado, and if more water were to he sold out of the basin, there would <br /> be less wealth created in the valley, meaning less retail business in this community - and a subsequent lowering of our sales tax base. <br /> That fact has not gone unnoticed by some members of City Council, and they should be commended for taking a wider view than the <br /> narrow focus of HR 3881 as it currently is written. <br /> The current drought should bring home to everyone in this basin what could happen by shipping more water wholesale up north. <br /> Furthermore, the more water that would be diverted from near the top of the river, the lower the quality of the water would be. <br /> These are all core issues for this entire region that really go to the heart of the matter. We need more people who will take the broader view. <br /> 0 1996 -2002 The pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> • <br /> http:// www.chieftain.com/print/archive /2002 /may112/edil.htm 05/13/2002 <br />