My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:30 AM
Creation date
6/1/2010 11:18:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Pueblo RICD
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/17/2005
Author
Chris Woodka, Pueblo Chieftan
Title
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ze Pueblo Chieftain Online Page 2 of 2 <br /> "We have to take our values and needs and blend the choices, so most can get <br /> what most of what they need," George said. <br /> The Southeastern District and others remain in negotiations with Chaffee County <br /> over its RICD application, said attorney Steve Leonhardt. <br /> Leonhardt reported Thursday Chaffee County is lowering minimum flow numbers <br /> to accommodate exchanges on the river. Colorado Springs and Aurora are arguing <br /> for more opportunity for exchanges in drought recovery years. <br /> Leonhardt said smaller water users in the Southeastern District may need more <br /> exchange opportunities in future years as well, and current legal action is <br /> protecting those interests. <br /> ©1 996- 2007The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> http : / /www.chieftain.com/print.php ?article= /metro /1127019600/11/sea 2/14/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.