Laserfiche WebLink
Tnstream Flow Survey Data <br /> The DOW, in September of 2005 and March of 2006, collected stream cross section information, <br /> natural environment data, and other data needed to evaluate the 100 cfs instream flow <br /> recommendation proposed and supported by CWCB staff, the City of Pueblo and other local <br /> water users. The stream cross section data was analyzed using the R2CROSS program. The <br /> R2CROSS output was evaluated using the methods described in Nehring (1979) and Espegren <br /> (1996). DOW collected physical data at four different cross - section locations at three different <br /> discharges (see attached map). The observed flows ranged from a high of 260 cfs to a low of 58 <br /> cfs. The width of the Arkansas River at the four study sites ranged from 160 feet to 132 feet. <br /> Cross - Section Locations <br /> Data relating to the individual cross - sections are discussed below: <br /> • Site #1 is located approximately 1 /4 mile downstream of Pueblo Reservoir. The bank full <br /> width of this cross- section was 151 ft and had a hydraulic slope of less than 1%. Data <br /> collection flows at this site included flows of 58, 89, 155 and 260 cfs. <br /> • Site #2 is located near the eastern end of Pueblo Reservoir. The bank full width of this <br /> cross - section was 132 ft and had a hydraulic slope of less than 1 %. Data collection flows <br /> at this site included flows of 92, 155, 178 and 264 cfs. <br /> • Site #3 is located approximately 100 yards down -stream of the railroad bridge crossing <br /> the Arkansas River near Reservoir Road. The bank full width of this cross- section was <br /> 160 ft and had a hydraulic slope of less than 1 %. Data collection flows at this site <br /> included flows of 85, 155, 174 and 252 cfs. <br /> • Site #4 is located approximately %z mile upstream of the confluence with Fountain Creek. <br /> The bank full width of this cross - section was 141 ft and had a hydraulic slope of less than <br /> 1 %. Data collection flows at this site included flows of 82, 136 and 223 cfs. <br /> Table 1: Stream Flow Hydraulics and Channel Characteristics at 100 cfs <br /> Cross - section % Wetted Average Depth Average Velocity <br /> Perimeter <br /> #1 — Below Reservoir 69.8% 0.89 feet 1.06 ft/s <br /> #2 — Lower State Park 72.0% 0.76 feet 1.33 ft/s <br /> #3 — Below RR -Xing 75.9% 0.53 feet 1.54 ft/s <br /> #4 — Above Fountain Ck 61.3% 0.53 feet 2.19 ft/s <br /> A 100 cfs instream flow would provide: <br /> • Enough water to wet approximately 70% of the stream channel at 3 of the four x- section <br /> locations and 61% of the stream channel at cross - section #4; <br /> • An average depth of close to 0.5 feet at all four cross - sections and nearly 0.9 feet at <br /> cross - section #1; and <br /> • An average velocity of over 1.0 feet per second at all cross - sections. <br /> 8 <br />