My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Decree Case No. 98CW448
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Decree Case No. 98CW448
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:11 AM
Creation date
6/1/2010 9:33:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Golden RICD
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/13/2001
Author
Jonathan W. Hays
Title
Decree Case No. 98CW448
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. Intent to Appropriate. The court finds that Golden possessed the requisite intent <br /> to appropriate water for the amounts and time periods shown in Tables I and 2, <br /> below. <br /> 6. Absolute and Conditional Amounts. Golden is entitled to an absolute decree for <br /> those flow rates that have been put to beneficial use, i.e., actually used to date by <br /> boaters running the Course. The absolute water rights claimed by Golden in the <br /> application were based, inter alia, upon measured flows at the Clear Creek Gage <br /> when the course was in use by boaters. <br /> In many months, there was insufficient evidence of gage flows during use. <br /> The court finds that in such instances, average monthly flows for the 26 -year <br /> period 1974 -1999 provide a reasonable estimate of the stream stages anticipated <br /> and actually used by boaters. Where the evidence has tied a given use to a <br /> contemporaneous flow rate, the court concludes that the maximum such <br /> coincidence of use and flow rate, in a given month, establishes flow rate for that <br /> month for which Golden is entitled to an absolute decree. <br /> The court also distinguishes between day and night use, inasmuch as there <br /> is a substantial difference in density of use before and after dark. In addition, <br /> Golden's plan to encourage night use by installing lights to illuminate the stream <br /> is still in the planning stage. The court has chosen 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. as a <br /> year -round average demarcation between light and dark, recognizing that <br /> seasonal differences are substantial. Golden may yet, during the diligence <br /> period, establish actual use -flow rate data to justify a decree for recreational <br /> rights throughout all or part of a twenty -four hour period. However, perfection of <br /> nighttime rights must be established from uses that occur between one -hour after <br /> sundown and one hour before sunrise. Tying decreed flow rates to actual diurnal <br /> and monthly use will limit Golden's appropriation to that amount of water <br /> actually put to beneficial use at given points in time. <br /> Tables 1 and 2 show the respective decreed rates for day and night use. <br /> The first row of each table lists the total monthly flow rates, in cubic feet per <br /> second (cfs), that Golden seeks. The second row lists the flow rates that were <br /> appropriated and applied to beneficial use by Golden, for the months given, and <br /> which the court is now decreeing to be absolute. The third row lists the difference <br /> in flow rates between row 1 and row 2, and which the court now decrees to be <br /> conditional. As . is apparent from Table 2, the court has insufficient data to decree <br /> night uses to be absolute. <br /> 2 Flow rates decreed absolute for the months of April, June, July and August are from State's Exhibit S-4.1 <br /> The court includes users of any flotation device in the term `boaters ". <br /> •` Calculated by the court from Exhibit G -3. <br /> • <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.