My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Decree Case No. 98CW448
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Decree Case No. 98CW448
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:11 AM
Creation date
6/1/2010 9:33:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Golden RICD
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/13/2001
Author
Jonathan W. Hays
Title
Decree Case No. 98CW448
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> Jurisdiction. Timely and adequate notice of the filing of this Application was given as <br /> required by law and this Court has jurisdiction over this Application and over all parties affected <br /> thereby, whether or not they have chosen to appear. <br /> Diversion Structures. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37- 92- 103(7), a diversion of water may <br /> include "controlling water in its natural course or location by means of a ... structure or <br /> device." The dam structures and flow deflector control devices which constitute the City of <br /> Golden's White Water Course and which will constitute the Extension are such diversion <br /> structures or devices. See City of Thornton v. City of Fort Collins, 830 P.2d 915 (Colo. 1992). <br /> Golden's constitutional right to appropriate a new water right in accordance with <br /> Colorado law may not be denied or limited based upon the public trust doctrine, or similar policy <br /> restraints purportedly rooted in concern for the quantities that should be left for future water <br /> . users. " [A] public interest theory is in conflict with the doctrine of prior appropriation because a <br /> water court cannot, in the absence of statutmy authority, deny a legitimate appropriation based <br /> on public policy." Board of County Commissioners, 891 P.2d 952, 972 (Colo. 1995); Aspen <br /> Wilderness Workshop v. Colorado Water Conservation Board, 901 P.2d 1251, 1263 (Colo. <br /> 1995). <br /> I I <br /> Recreational use is a beneficial use of water in Colorado. <br /> RULING AND DECREE <br /> G. The foregoing Findings of Facts and Conclusions of law are fully incorporated into this <br /> Ruling and Decree by this reference. <br /> H. The absolute water rights for the structures constituting the City of Golden White Water <br /> Course are hereby decreed set forth set forth inTables 1 and 2, above. <br /> The conditional water rights for the White Water Course are hereby decreed as set forth in <br /> Tables 1 and 2, above. <br /> J. The conditional water rights for the for the proposed Extension are hereby decreed in <br /> amounts as set forth in Table 3, above, for the respective 12 -hour periods set forth in <br /> Tables 1 and 2. However, as above, perfection of nighttime rights must be established <br /> from uses that occur between one -hour after sundown and one hour before sunrise. <br /> K. An Application for Sextenniai Finding of Reasonable Diligence shall be filed on or <br /> before the last day of June 2007, if Golden desires to maintain its conditional water <br /> rights, - a showing made on or before said date that the conditional rights have been <br /> made absolute by completion of the appropriation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.