Laserfiche WebLink
whether Applicant's intended in- channel recreational diversion <br /> was in fact a RICD as defined by SB 216, the water court erred <br /> when it awarded Applicant a decree in the claimed stream flow <br /> amounts. For these reasons, the Supreme Court reverses the order <br /> and decree of the water court and remands this case to the water <br /> court with directions to remand to the CWCB for further <br /> proceedings consistent with its opinion. <br /> 3 <br />