My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:02 AM
Creation date
5/21/2010 2:32:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison RICD
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
6/24/2003
Author
Ken Salazar, Susan Schneider
Title
C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures of The CWCB, Case No. 02CW38
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1) <br /> 1 <br /> k 1 <br /> } . CHAPTER I 3 <br /> In 1918, under a contract with the Imperial Irrigation District, the All- American Canal Board, chaired by <br /> Dr. Meade, recommended legislation which would authorize a high dam for the storage of Colorado River <br /> water and an All- American Canal to Imperial Valley. <br /> This led to the Kincaid Act in 1920 (41 Stat. 600) which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make a <br /> study of the diversion and use of Colorado River waters. This resulted in the Fall -Davis Report in 1922, en- <br /> titled "Problems of Imperial Valley and Vicinity" (Senate Document No. 142, 67th Congress, Second Ses- <br /> sion). The report recommended the All- American Canal and a storage dam in the Lower Basin, rather than <br /> in. the Upper Basin, as the best possible site for flood control, storage, and a power development nearest to <br /> the markets for power in southern California. Its data were also used by the negotiators of the Colorado River <br /> Compact. The Fall -Davis Report stated that the Colordo River problems "... are of such magnitude as to be <br /> beyond the reach of other than a national solution." And, finally, in 1924, the Weymouth Report spelled out <br /> the details of what soon became the Boulder Canyon Project. <br /> B. Colorado River Compact <br /> B.1 Background <br /> The rapidly expanding use of Colorado River water in California was viewed with increasing alarm by of- <br /> la's in the Upper Basin States. As a consequence of their concern, the League of the Southwest .. <br /> organized in 1919 to promote +fie'orderly development and equitable division of the waters of the Colorado <br /> River. Congress approved the Kincaid Act in 1920 (41 Stat. 600) directing the Secretary of the Interior to <br /> make a full and comprehensive study and to report on the possible diversion and use of waters of the Colo- <br /> rado River. <br /> During the period when the studies by the Secretary were being conducted, negotiations were underway <br /> by the seven Basin States for an inter -State agreement on the waters of the river which led to the Colorado <br /> River Compact. While it was recognized that storage on the river was essential, the Upper Basin States faced <br /> • the possibility that water conserved by storage would be put to use in the Lower Basin more rapidly than the <br /> Upper Basin could utilize its share of the normal flow and thus form the basis for Lower Basin claims of appro- <br /> priative rights in the water. Hence, the Upper Basin insisted that rights to some of the Colorado River flows be <br /> reserved for their future benefit. This could be done by a suit in the Supreme Court for equitable apportion- <br /> ment or by agreement of the parties, although the latter had never been used to allocate waters of an inter - <br /> State stream. <br /> B.2 Negotiations <br /> As a result of negotiations among the seven Basin States, it was agreed that an inter -State compact would <br /> establish an equitable apportionment of the waters and protect the Upper Basin States. Each of the seven <br /> Basin States adopted the authorizing legislation in 1921 and Congress consented to the negotiations by legis- <br /> lation enacted on August 19, 1921 (42 Stat. 171). The Colorado River Compact Commission convened in <br /> January 1922. Herbert Hoover, then Secretary of Commerce, was elected chairman. <br /> The Upper Basin's fears and the wisdom of the decision to attempt an inter -State agreement was <br /> demonstrated when the Supreme Court of the United States on June 5, 1922, in Wyoming v. Colorado, 259 <br /> U.S. 419, upheld the doctrine of priority of appropriations regardless of State lines. <br /> B.3 Major Compact Prouisions <br /> After 27 meetings, a final agreement on the Compacf Vas signed in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on November <br /> 24, 1922. Although the States had hoped to allocate the Colorado River waters among each of the seven <br /> ' Basin States, such agreement was not possible. However, the Colorado River Compact did negotiate a <br /> historic document. It had the following major provisions: <br /> (1) Article I states the purposes of the Compact. <br /> (2) Article II(a) defines the "Colorado River System" as "that portion of the Colorado River and its <br /> tributaries within the United States of America." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.