My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Response of CO Water Users and Officials to Motion to Stay Proceedings
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Response of CO Water Users and Officials to Motion to Stay Proceedings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:30 AM
Creation date
5/21/2010 12:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison River
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
9/22/2003
Author
Ken Salazar, Carol D. Angel, Bratton & McClow LLC, Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison and Woodruff P.C., Burns, Figs & Will, P.C.
Title
Response of CO Water Users and Officials to Motion to Stay Proceedings
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bureau, Montrose County Farm Bureau and the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />( "Colorado Water Users and Officials "), through their attorneys, herein respond in opposition to <br />Environmental Opposers' Motion for Stay of Proceedings. The issue before this Court is whether <br />these proceedings should be stayed because the Environmental Opposers' have filed a complaint in <br />the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Gale Norton, the United States <br />Department of the Interior, Fran Minella and the National Park Service ( "United States "). <br />Environmental Opposers' federal complaint warrants careful scrutiny because it is the sole <br />basis for their eleventh -hour request for a stay. The heart of Environmental Opposers' complaint <br />is the prayer for relief at pages 23 and 24, where they set forth the remedy they seek from the federal <br />court. If they are not allowed to stay this case in order to pursue those federal remedies, <br />Environmental Opposers assert that their federal rights "could be severely prejudiced." Motion for <br />Stay at 1. <br />The first five paragraphs of Environmental Opposers' prayer for relief request various <br />declaratory judgments, primarily under the federal Administrative Procedure Act and the National <br />Environmental Policy Act. The two actions Environmental Opposers seek from the United States <br />District Court are then set forth: (1) "Order [the United States] to cease [its] violations of [federal] <br />law, specifically by securing river flows for the Black Canyon in quantities and with the <br />frequencies necessary to fulfill [the United States'] obligations to the Park under the NPS Act <br />' The Enviromnental Opposers include the following parties: Trout Unlimited; Counsel for <br />Environmental Defense, High Country Citizens' Alliance; The Wilderness Society; Western <br />Colorado Congress; and Western Slope Environmental Resource Council. Counsel for <br />Environmental Defense has not joined in the federal complaint. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.