My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Drought & Water Management
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
Drought & Water Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2010 3:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/29/2010 2:43:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
What the Current Drought Means for the Future of Water Management in Colorado
Date
1/1/2003
Description
2002 Drought Impact Report
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Reports
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VI. An Integrated Approach to Meet Colorado's Future Water Demands <br />and Drought Management Needs <br />This section outlines our view of the three elements of Colorado's water future: 1) conservation <br />and demand management; 2) municipal- agricultural cooperation; and 3) supply integration, <br />management, and development. However, we first discuss the cost range estimates for a variety <br />of water management options. We conclude this section by presenting the concept of an annual <br />water supply reliability report, an accounting to customers on the status of utilities' systems <br />current and expected future performance. <br />A. Range of Costs for a Variety of Water Management Options <br />Cost effectiveness, defined in terms of dollars per acre -foot of reliable yield, is an important <br />consideration in water supply development and water demand management. The costs <br />associated with various water supply development options and water conservation measures can <br />range from less than $1,000 to over $20,000 per acre -foot of yield. While the cost effectiveness <br />of a given supply project or demand management strategy will be influenced by project- specific <br />and utility- specific factors, some general observations can be made regarding the relative cost <br />effectiveness of different types of options. Denver Water, as part of its Integrated Resource <br />Planning process, developed preliminary cost estimates for a wide range of demand management <br />and supply development options that it is considering (see Table VI. 1). These estimates may or <br />may not be representative of these options in other settings, but they are illustrative of costs that <br />water users face. The costs do not incorporate all mitigation and they do not reflect the financial <br />benefits of phasing that are associated with small projects. For the most part, the low end of the <br />range in each category represents the costs associated with the proposals we advance below. <br />Table VIA. The Range of Cost Estimates for a Variety of Water Management <br />Options (from Denver Water IRP) <br />f <br />i T y o Pray <br />€ € ' <br />fast Rng+° per o <br />Water Conservation <br />$4 to $8,000 <br />Acquisition/Change of Irrigation Rights <br />$700 to $12,000 <br />System Refinements <br />$700 to $16,000 <br />Reservoir Enlargement <br />$1,400 to $10,000 <br />Exchange /Augmentation <br />$4,600 to $10,200 <br />Conjunctive Use <br />$7,400 <br />Nonpotable Reuse <br />$800 <br />New Transbasin Diversions <br />$4,300 to $11,700 <br />New Reservoirs <br />$5,300 to $19,500 <br />Indirect Potable Reuse <br />$14,000 to $16,000 <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.