My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Drought & Water Management
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
Drought & Water Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2010 3:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/29/2010 2:43:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
What the Current Drought Means for the Future of Water Management in Colorado
Date
1/1/2003
Description
2002 Drought Impact Report
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Reports
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Tourism <br />Tourism is estimated to generate $7 or $8 billion annually in Colorado. In April, the <br />Office of State Planning and Budgeting identified several possible impacts that a drought <br />could have on tourism: <br />➢ Decline in skier visits due to lack of snow; <br />➢ Decline in hunting because of a loss of habitat from wildfires or herd size from lack <br />of precipitation; <br />➢ Decline in fishing and rafting because of lower stream levels; <br />➢ Decline in outdoor recreation because of fire bans and /or restricted access; <br />➢ Decline in resort visits if water restrictions are imposed on golf courses; and <br />➢ Decline in touring and parks visits if forest fires impact these areas. <br />1. Ski Industry <br />The state's list of potential impacts from the drought started with ski lift ticket sales, <br />based on the fear of a repeat of the almost 40% sales drop in the 1977 drought. <br />Fortunately, that loss did not occur in 2002. In 1977, snowmaking was uncommon and <br />ski areas were dependent on natural snow. Today, most ski areas have water rights that <br />allow at least basic snowmaking even during a major drought. The 2001 -2002 ski season <br />did suffer some loss of business, but most of it was early in the season at destination <br />resorts and the standard explanation was fear of flying after the events of September 11, <br />2001. Late season skiing was nearly as busy as prior years. The concern last spring was <br />about the 2002 -2003 ski season and whether drought would affect sales this season. The <br />early snow has been good at most ski areas and all signs are that the 2002 drought will <br />have no effect on the skiing portion of tourism. <br />2. Water- Dependent Tourism <br />The drought seriously affected rafting in 2002 as river levels were much lower than <br />average and there just wasn't the water to raft. The total estimated economic impact <br />generated by this industry in 2001 was $125 million, based on direct expenditures of $49 <br />million. That dropped by about 50% in 2002 due to short seasons on most rivers. The <br />economic impact of the loss is about $60 million. <br />Boating in general was also down. Water -based state parks reported reductions between <br />20% and 53% in revenues to the state as boat ramps were left high and dry by falling <br />water levels. Average revenues appear to be off by about one -third for boating other than <br />rafting. Boating has been estimated at $550 million per year including rafting, or about <br />$425 million other than rafting. If the boating was down by one third, then this was a <br />loss of about $140 million. The Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation <br />(Parks) mentioned that there was one benefit in that the low water levels have allowed <br />them to accelerate some needed maintenance work and to extend ramps in some places to <br />protect from future low water levels. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.