Laserfiche WebLink
III. Economic Impacts of the Drought <br />A. Background <br />Newspaper reports suggest that the economic impact of the drought in 2002 was $1.1 <br />billion. That would be roughly 0.6% of Colorado's gross state product, although a much <br />higher fraction of some agricultural counties' income. The precise source of the estimate <br />is difficult to track down, but appears to come from the Colorado Farm Bureau. The <br />estimate is almost certainly wrong as much of the loss is too difficult to estimate or won't <br />show up until future years. The estimate assumes that water -based tourism and <br />agriculture incurred the most costs, with some additional losses due to forest fires. <br />However, those sectors were not alone. Some homeowners and businesses have losses <br />due to declining water levels in wells. In extreme cases, some must redrill wells to reach <br />the lower water tables. Owners of landscaped property have costs in replacing <br />landscaping killed or injured by drought if the injury is more than temporary. Landscape <br />providers have at least temporary losses when restrictions are placed on new landscaping <br />or landscape maintenance. On the other hand if they survive, they may recoup those <br />losses later when landowners purchase replacement landscaping after the drought is over. <br />Providers may also come out ahead as people replace present plants with more water <br />efficient ones. Individuals may suffer losses when forced to pay more attention to how <br />they apply their water to their landscape, but these losses are not measurable unless they <br />interfere with the person's market activities. <br />Some of these losses will not show up in the product accounts for the state. For example, <br />if a person loses $1000 worth of landscaping because of the drought and then replaces it <br />with a similar amount of material next year, the net effect would be somewhere between <br />zero and $1000 gain in state product. It would be zero if the purchase of landscape <br />material comes at the expense of other consumption (e.g. fewer dinners out). It would be <br />$1000 if the expense comes out of savings or working harder to increase income. In each <br />case, the person has a loss of $1000, but the State shows a gain or at least neutrality. <br />B. Agriculture <br />1. Dry Land and Irrigated Agriculture in Colorado's Economy <br />In a normal year, agriculture produces about $4.6 billion in total sales in Colorado, <br />between 2.5% and 3% of the $175 billion gross state product, but net agricultural income <br />is around $700 million, which is only 0.4% of state income. Two - thirds of sales are from <br />livestock and the other third from crops. The major crops are corn, wheat, vegetables and <br />hay. Sod and landscaping plants are another major sector that is sometimes included and <br />sometimes not included in agriculture. In this report, landscaping will be related to <br />municipal water use, not agriculture. <br />In 2002, the drought seriously injured much of agriculture. The specifics are hard to <br />identify, in part, because the data are still being collected. Basically, irrigated agriculture <br />13 <br />