Laserfiche WebLink
<br />405 Waters and Water Courses <br />405VI Appropriation and Prescription <br /> <br />405k128 k. Constitutional and Statutory Provisions. Most Cited Cases <br /> <br /> <br />Statute permitting appropriation of water for recreational purposes, including fishery and <br />wildlife, was not unconstitutionally vague and did not make impermissible delegation of <br />legislative authority to Colorado Water Conservation Board. C.R.S. '73, 37-92-102(3), <br />37-92-103(3, 4, 10). <br /> <br />[4] KeyCite Notes <br /> <br />405 Waters and Water Courses <br />405VI Appropriation and Prescription <br /> <br />405k141 Nature and Extent of Rights Acquired <br /> <br />405k143 k. Quantity of Water. Most Cited Cases <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, in exercising its authority under statute permitting <br />appropriation of water for recreational purposes, did not inadequately discharge its duty <br />of establishing quantity of water necessary to "preserve the natural environment to a <br />reasonable degree." C.R.S. '73, 37-92- 102(3), 37-92-103(3, 4, 10). <br />**570 *470 Delaney & Balcomb, Kenneth Balcomb, Scott Balcomb, Glenwood Springs, <br />for objectors-appellants Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. <br />Maynes, Bradford & Duncan, Frank E. Maynes, Durango, for objectors-appellants **571 <br />Southwestern Colo. Water Conservation Dist. <br />*471 J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. <br />Donovan, Sol. Gen., David W. Robbins, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for applicant- <br />appellee The Colorado Water Conservation Bd. <br />Musick, Williamson, Schwartz, Leavenworth & Cope, P. C., Boulder, Loyal E. <br />Leavenworth, Boulder, John D. Musick, Jr., Boulder, for third party appellees, The City of <br />Aspen, Colo. and The Bd. of County Com'rs of the County of Pitkin. <br />Ruth M. Wright, Boulder, for amicus curiae, League of Women Voters of Colo., Musick, <br />Williamson, Schwartz, Leavenworth & Cope, P. C., Boulder, Alan E. Schwartz, Boulder, <br />for amici curiae, Colo. Open Space Council, Colo. Wildlife Federation, Nat'l Wildlife <br />Federation, Colo. Council of Trout Unlimited, Colo. Audubon Council, Crystal Valley <br />Environmental Protection Ass'n. <br /> <br /> <br />GROVES, Justice. <br />This case involves three applications by the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />(Colorado Water Board) for minimum stream flow rights under an act commonly referred <br />to as Senate Bill 97,[FN1] enacted by the General Assembly in 1973. [FN2] The <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District and the Southwestern Water Conservation <br />District (the Districts) objected. The water judge entered decrees as requested in the <br />applications. The Districts appealed. We affirm. <br />FN1. Codified as subsections 37-92-102(3) and 37-92-103(3), (4) and <br />(10), C.R.S.1973. <br /> <br />FN2. Colo.Sess.Laws 1973, ch. 442, at 1521. <br /> <br />