My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Crystal River Supreme Court Case Decision
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
Crystal River Supreme Court Case Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2016 9:38:34 AM
Creation date
3/29/2010 11:43:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
76W2720
Stream Name
Crystal River
Watershed
Roaring Fork River
Water Division
5
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Final Decree/Stipulations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Districts have not shown that the Colorado Water Board's conclusion was at all <br />unfounded or arbitrary. <br />We conclude that the Colorado Water Board did abide by the terms of its delegated <br />authority in establishing the quantity of water necessary to accomplish the purposes of <br />Senate Bill 97. <br />Judgment affirmed. <br /> <br />LEE and CARRIGAN, JJ., do not participate. <br />Colo., 1979. <br />Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. Colorado Water Conservation Bd. <br />197 Colo. 469, 594 P.2d 570 <br /> <br /> <br />END OF DOCUMENT <br /> <br />West Reporter Image (PDF) <br /> <br />(C) 2005 Tho <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.