Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />Grand Valley Lake Conceptual 5tudy <br />Work Scope, Scheduie and Budget Estimate <br />INTRODUCTIUN <br />A presentation of a potential "Grand Valley Lake" (GVL) pro}ect was made to the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board (CWCB) in September 2007. Subsequent to that presentation, the Redlands Water and Power Company <br />(Redlands) and the Orchard Mesa Irrigation District (OMID) made a joint request to the CWCB fox a <br />cornprehensive study of the feasibility af the project. Project information, including letters of support for the <br />study from the two study sponsors, was provided ta the CWCB in a dooument titled "Potential Grrand Valley Lake <br />Study" that was compiled by Donald E. Clay Professional Engineers and Associates. This supporting information <br />is referred to below as "Clay 2007 Document". It contains preliminary information for a new darn and reservoir <br />south of the Colorado River, between the towns of Crraiid Junction and Palisade, Colorada described as follows; <br />"This plan would divert about 300 cfs of water from the Gunnison River via 50 — 60 miles of canal and <br />tunnels. T'he aqueduct would provide an average annual water supply of 175,400 acre-feet to the potential <br />Grand Valley Lake (Reservoir) for use in the Grand Valley and surrounding areas. The offstream lake <br />would a surface area of about 1,SQ0 — 2,000 acres." <br />Other information presented in the document includes: <br />+ Preliminary Cost Estimates and Layouts <br />• Site Geology <br />• Hydrology <br />• Water Quality <br />• Water Rights <br />• Economics <br />The information in the document has varying levels of detail. The information presented in the Clay 2007 <br />Document will be reviewed for reasonableness and consistency. <br />The purpose of the eurrent study is defined in tYae Work Scope below, and will provide general assessments to: <br />1. assess general feasibility from geologic/geotechnical and hydraulic engineering perspectives; <br />2. assess the relative magnitude and potential sources of construction materials for alternative types of dams; <br />3. assess the relative suitability of the project from a reservoir/demand/yield perspective; <br />4. qualitatively assess tt�e impacts to the river from alternative operational scenarias; <br />5. identify the major pernuts and/or regulatory approvals that would likely be needed; and <br />6. provide conceptual level opinions of probable construction costs. <br />The Work Scope is comprised of five tasks: 1) Project Management; 2) Data Colleetion and Review; 3) Site <br />Reconnaissance; 4) Data Analysis and 5) Project Report. These categories are listed in chronolo�ical order of <br />when they begin, even though there will be overlap in execution. Detailed descriptions and deliverables for each <br />task are presented below. <br />! <br />BOVLE E e��� c�{:��.�'� <br />Grand_Valley_Dam_Seope_3-9-09.doc 1 x <br />