Laserfiche WebLink
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RAIN GARDENS <br />Thompson Lake Rain Garden <br />0 <br />0 <br />• <br />• <br />Inlet <br />0 <br />Hydraulic Conductivity" +� <br />[cm /s] <br />• 0.000001 -0.003 Inlet <br />0 0.003 - 0.006 0 O <br />0.006 - 0.012 <br />0.012 - 0.024 " <br />• 0.024 -0.06 W E <br />0 2 4 8 12 16 <br />Meters s <br />FIGURE 5. Map Showing the Range of Ksat Values <br />Measured Using the MPD Infiltrometer Locations Within <br />the Thompson Lake (11) Rain Garden. <br />by fine solid deposition clogging the macropores <br />connected to the surface; however, this effect was not <br />measured. <br />The UM — Duluth (12) rain garden (Figure 6) had <br />the greatest variability in the measured Ksat values. <br />The rain garden contained two distinct types of soil: <br />coarse sand located directly over an underdrain sys- <br />tem and sandy loam overlying clay beneath the vege- <br />tated portions of the rain garden. The overall size of <br />this rain garden was 1,350 m which consisted of <br />both upland or woodland zones and rain garden <br />zones. No MPD measurements were made in the <br />woodland zones as the area was at a higher elevation <br />than the rain garden portion. Measurements were <br />concentrated near the inlet of the rain garden and <br />along the pathways of the underdrains. The highest <br />measured Ksat values were primarily located on the <br />coarse sand trenches where the underdrains were <br />located. As stormwater enters the rain garden via the <br />sediment forebay, it flows directly to the areas con- <br />taining the coarse sand and much of it flows down- <br />ward into the tile drains. The low Ksat values <br />University of Minnesota, Duluth <br />Rain Garden <br />Hydraulic Conductivity <br />[curls] <br />Inlet <br />Sediment Torbay <br />• 0.0600006 - 0.003 <br />F <br />O 0.003 - 0.006 <br />0.006 - 0.012 <br />• 0.012 -0.024 <br />` s <br />0.024 -0.07 <br />0 4 8 16 24 <br />32 <br />Meters <br />FIGURE 6. Map Showing the Range of Ksat Values <br />Measured Using the MPD Infiltrometer at Various <br />Locations Within the UM — Duluth (12) Rain Garden. <br />( <2.6 x 10 -3 cm/s) were primarily in the vicinity of <br />the sediment forebay (northwest corner) and lime- <br />stone rock riprap inlet in the southwest corner of the <br />rain garden. <br />At the UM — St. Paul (6) campus rain garden (Fig- <br />ure 7), all of the low Ksat values ( <2.9 x 10 -3 cm/s) <br />were located near the center of the basin. Two of the <br />MPD tests conducted in the center of the basin <br />required more than 3 h to drain. Overall, 58% of the <br />MPD tests were completed in less than 1 h at this <br />site. The low Ksat values found here could be a combi- <br />nation of the restrictive soil layer found at the <br />20 -48 cm depth and clogging of surface soils due to <br />the settling of particles from the stormwater runoff. <br />This rain garden receives stormwater from both the <br />storm sewer system and from the street via a curb <br />cut. The inlets occur at the north and northwest por- <br />tion of the rain garden, which is also where one MPD <br />test (located just below the north inlet) was termi- <br />nated because there was no change in the water level <br />over a time period of 3 h. <br />The distributions of Ksat data for each rain garden <br />are shown in Figure 8. Statistical analyses were per- <br />formed on the measured Ksat values and the descrip- <br />tive statistics including arithmetic mean, geometric <br />mean, median, SD, and CV of Ksat for each rain gar- <br />den were computed and are summarized in Table 3. <br />The variability of Ksat was large as indicated by the <br />CV range (57- 174 %) (Hillel, 1998). Based on the com- <br />bination of statistical tools utilized, it was determined <br />that a log- normal distribution fit the data best in all <br />cases. It has been observed that field hydraulic <br />conductivity data are often best described by a log- <br />normal distribution (Bjerg et al., 1992; Vauclin et al., <br />JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 1027 JAWRA <br />